[2024] KEHC 16022 (KLR)
The court found that the right to a fair trial under Article 50(2)(k) of the Constitution requires that the accused be supplied with documents that are true and complete copies of those relied upon by the prosecution. Since there was no dispute that the words 'blood sample' were missing from the defence copy of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 16022 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Asman Onsiro Makhotsa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bungoma
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E015 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Interlocutory Ruling
- Outcome
- application_granted
- Judges
- REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Fair Trial Rights, Evidence Authenticity, Document Examination
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Asman Onsiro Makhotsa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Interlocutory Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the post-mortem report supplied to the defence is a true copy of the original as required for a fair trial.
- 2 Whether the words 'blood sample' in the post-mortem report should be subjected to handwriting expert analysis to determine their authorship.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the right to a fair trial under Article 50(2)(k) of the Constitution requires that the accused be supplied with documents that are true and complete copies of those relied upon by the prosecution. Since there was no dispute that the words 'blood sample' were missing from the defence copy of the post-mortem report, and given the importance of ensuring the integrity of evidence, the court held that subjecting the report to handwriting expert analysis was necessary. The court determined that this would not prejudice the prosecution and was essential to resolve the authenticity issue raised by the defence.
Court Disposition
application_granted
Orders
- The post-mortem report dated 6.4.2023 and produced as exhibit 5 shall be subjected to a handwriting expert to ascertain if the words 'blood sample' are in the same handwriting as the rest of the report.
- A certified copy of the report shall be left in court while the original is sent to the handwriting expert.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
Republic v Makhotsa (Criminal Case E015 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 16022 (KLR) (13 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 16022 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Bungoma
Criminal Case E015 of 2023
REA Ougo, J
November 13, 2024
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Asman Onsiro Makhotsa
Accused
Ruling
1. Counsel for the accused seeks to have the words “ Blood Sample” in the post-mortem report dated 6. 2.2023 subjected to a handwriting expert, to establish who wrote the said words. Her reason for this request is that the words “ blood sample” are not in the copy of the post-mortem supplied to the defence. It has been submitted that the produced document has not yet been admitted in evidence, as the document is admitted when the court will be writing a ruling or judgment.
2. The prosecution objected to the request by the defence on the basis that it had no legal basis as the post-mortem report had been produced in evidence and that the defence would have a chance to interrogate it through submissions. That the application will cause an unfair and unnecessary delay in concluding the matter.
3. In every criminal trial the accused has a right to a fair trial ( see Article 50 (2) (k) of the Constitution 2010). In my view, a fair trial includes and is not limited to ensuring that the documents the prosecution is relying on and supplied to the defence must be a true reflection/ copy of the original one. There is no dispute that the words “ Blood Sample” are missing from the copy of the post-mortem supplied to the defence. The issue raised by the defence on the writing “ blood sample” does require interrogation. No prejudice will be caused to the prosecution.
4. I therefore grant the application by the accused that the post-mortem report dated 6. 4.2023 and produced as exhibit 5 shall be subjected to a handwriting expert to ascertain if the words “ blood sample” are the same as the other handwriting in the body of the said report. A certified copy shall be left in the court as the original one is sent to the handwriting expert. In the event, further handwriting samples are required from Pw8, I urge him to do so as soon as possible to enable examination of the writings by the expert to enable him to submit a report to this court on a date to be given in court.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT BUNGOMA ON THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024. R. E .OUGOJUDGEIn the presence of;Accused - AbsentMiss Wakoli -For the AccusedMiss Kibet -For the ProsecutionWilkister - C/A