[2023] KEHC 2777 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 2777 (KLR)

The court found that, after reviewing the record and observing the witnesses, the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. Consequently, the accused was put on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The ruling was based on the sufficiency of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 2777 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Faraj Wafula Makokha
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 6 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Outcome
Accused put on his defence.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Trial Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Prima Facie Case Burden of Proof Criminal Trial Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Faraj Wafula Makokha

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused person to warrant putting him on his defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, after reviewing the record and observing the witnesses, the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. Consequently, the accused was put on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The ruling was based on the sufficiency of the prosecution's evidence to meet the threshold for a prima facie case, as articulated in the Bhatt v Republic precedent.

Court Disposition

Accused put on his defence.

Orders

  • The accused is hereby put on his defence.