[2024] KEHC 5535 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 5535 (KLR)

The court found that the offence of murder is extremely serious and cannot be justified after conviction. While acknowledging the importance of correction and rehabilitation, the court determined that a non-custodial sentence would not adequately serve the interests of justice, public safety, or the need for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 5535 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Edwin Mukweyu Makokha; Defendant: Benson Mahitsi Mahaka
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 20 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentence
Outcome
Both accused persons sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment each, sentences to run from 29 February 2024.
Judges
PJO Otieno
Legal Topics
Murder, Sentencing Principles, Repeat Offender, Mitigation, Custodial Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Sentencing Principles Repeat Offender Mitigation Custodial Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Edwin Mukweyu Makokha

Defendant

Benson Mahitsi Mahaka

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Sentence

  1. 1 Whether a custodial or non-custodial sentence is appropriate for the offence of murder committed by the accused persons.
  2. 2 How the repeat offending and circumstances of the offence affect sentencing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the offence of murder is extremely serious and cannot be justified after conviction. While acknowledging the importance of correction and rehabilitation, the court determined that a non-custodial sentence would not adequately serve the interests of justice, public safety, or the need for deterrence, especially given the 2nd accused's status as a repeat offender who committed another offence while on bond. The court therefore imposed a custodial sentence of twenty-five years' imprisonment for each accused, with the sentence to run from the date of conviction and bond cancellation.

Court Disposition

Both accused persons sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment each, sentences to run from 29 February 2024.

Orders

  • Each accused person to serve an imprisonment term of twenty-five (25) years.
  • Sentence to be computed from 29.2.2024, the date of conviction and bond cancellation.