[2009] KEHC 953 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case for the grant of leave to apply for orders of certiorari and prohibition. The issuance of summons and a warrant of arrest by the Senior Principal Magistrate, Malindi, in the absence of any charges preferred against the applicant, raised serious...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 953 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Rimondi Gabriella; Respondent: Rodolfo Grecchi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review 1 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Leave to Apply for Certiorari and Prohibition
- Outcome
- Leave granted to apply for orders of certiorari and prohibition; stay of proceedings and execution of warrant ordered.
- Judges
- JV Juma
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Prohibition Orders, Private Prosecution, Warrants of Arrest
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rimondi Gabriella
Applicant
Rodolfo Grecchi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Leave to Apply for Certiorari and Prohibition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the summons issued by the Senior Principal Magistrate, Malindi, without charges being preferred, was null and void.
- 2 Whether the warrant of arrest issued against the applicant was irregular, incompetent, or issued without or in excess of jurisdiction.
- 3 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case for the grant of leave to apply for orders of certiorari and prohibition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case for the grant of leave to apply for orders of certiorari and prohibition. The issuance of summons and a warrant of arrest by the Senior Principal Magistrate, Malindi, in the absence of any charges preferred against the applicant, raised serious jurisdictional questions. The court determined that the applicant's rights could be prejudiced by the continued existence of the warrant and the proceedings in the lower court. Accordingly, the court granted leave to the applicant to apply for orders of certiorari and prohibition, and directed that the grant of leave would operate as a stay of further proceedings and execution of...
Court Disposition
Leave granted to apply for orders of certiorari and prohibition; stay of proceedings and execution of warrant ordered.
Orders
- Application certified as urgent and to be heard expeditiously.
- Leave granted to apply for an order of certiorari to quash the orders issued in Malindi Senior Principal Magistrate Misc. Criminal Application No. 935 of 2008 on 22/12/2008 and 10/3/2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
JUDICIAL REVIEW 1 OF 2009
IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION BY RIMONDI GABRIELLA FOR
LEAVE TO APPLY FOR AN ORDER OF CERTIORARI
AND PROHIBITION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: MALINDI SENIOR PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE’S
MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 935 OF 2008
RODOLFO GRECCHI –VS- RIMONDI GABRIELLA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE CHAPTER 75 LAWS
OF KENYA
RULING
Before this court is the Chamber Summons dated 4th May 2009 by which the ex-parte application seeks the following orders:-
a) That this application be certified as urgent and be heard expeditiously
b) The Applicant Gabriella Rimondi be granted leave to apply for an order of certiorari to bring to this court the orders issued in Malindi Senior Principal Magistrate Misc. Criminal Application No. 935 of 2008 on 22/12/2008 and 10/3/2009 requiring the applicant to attend that court for purposes of quashing them.
c) The applicant be granted leave to apply for an order of certiorari to bring to this court the proceedings , ruling, order and the warrant of arrest in Malindi Senior Principal Magistrate’s Misc. criminal Application No. 935 of 2008 made and issued on 10/3/2009 for the purpose of quashing them.
d) The applicant be granted leave to apply for an order of Prohibition to prohibit the Senior Principal Magistrate, Malindi and any other Magistrate at Malindi from executing the warrant of arrest ordered to be issued on 10/3/09 in Malindi Senior Principal Magistrate Misc. Criminal Application No. 935 of 2008 and from proceeding any further with the said criminal application.
e) Upon grant of leave this Honoruable Court be pleased to order and to direct that the grant of leave shall operate as a stay of further proceedings in Malindi Senior Principal Magistrate Misc. Criminal Application No. 935 of 2008 and of the execution of the said warrant of arrest.
The basic facts of this case are as follows. The Respondent in this matter one Rodolfo Grecchi is the estranged husband of the ex-parte applicant Rimondi Gabriella. The Respondent did file an application Misc. Criminal Application no. 935 of 2008 in the Malindi Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court seeking permission to commence private prosecution against the applicant herein. On the basis of the Respondent application and his supporting affidavit the learned SPM Malindi issued a summons requiring the attendance of the Applicant in court.
On 10. 3.2009 when the matter came up the applicant who was in Italy her native country was not in court although Mr. Ole Kina learned counsel was present on her behalf. The court then proceeded to issue a warrant of arrest against the applicant. Mr. Kinyua for the applicant in the present proceedings argues first that the summons issued against the Applicant ought not to have been issued by the SPM Malindi as no charges have as yet been preferred against the Applicant. He argues therefore that the summons issued on 16/7/08 is null and void. Secondly Mr.Kinyua argues that the warrant of arrest issued by the SPM Malindi against the Applicant was irregular, incompetent and was issued without or in excess of jurisdiction for the reason that there are no valid summons requiring the attendance of the Applicant in court. He tells this court that the Applicant who lives in Italy would have to expend her time and money to travel to Malindi for the case and she is fearful of doing so due to the warrant of arrest in existence against her.
This court will not delve into the merits or otherwise of the Respondent application to commence private prosecution against the application as that is not the matter before this court. Having listened to the submission of learned counsel Mr.Kinyua and having also perused the annexed supporting affidavit as well as the annexture hereto this court is satisfied that the exparte application has shown a prima facie case within the meaning ascribed to the term in the celebrated case of GIELLA –VS CASSMAN BROWN. This court therefore allows this present application in terms of prayers (a) (b) (c) (d) and (e) thereof. This court further orders that this matter be mentioned before the Honourable Judge Malindi High Court on 9th June 2009 for further directions.
Dated and delivered this 28th day of May 2009
M. ODERO
JUDGE
28. 5.09
Read in open court in absence of both parties.