[2022] KEHC 13667 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused person. This means that, if the accused chose to remain silent, the court could convict on the evidence presented. Therefore, the accused is required to be put on her defence in accordance with...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 13667 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Robai Buyombe Mang’eni
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 49 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Accused put on her defence.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Trial Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Robai Buyombe Mang’eni
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused person to warrant her being put on her defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused person. This means that, if the accused chose to remain silent, the court could convict on the evidence presented. Therefore, the accused is required to be put on her defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The ruling is based on the judge's assessment of the evidence on record and the legal threshold for a prima facie case as established in Kenyan criminal jurisprudence.
Court Disposition
Accused put on her defence.
Orders
- The accused, Robai Buyombe Mang’eni, is hereby put on her defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
Republic v Mang’eni (Criminal Case 49 of 2014) [2022] KEHC 13667 (KLR) (7 October 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 13667 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kakamega
Criminal Case 49 of 2014
WM Musyoka, J
October 7, 2022
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Robai Buyombe Mang’eni
Accused
Ruling
1. I have gone through the record herein, and I also had the benefit of hearing the witnesses herein.
2. Am persuaded that the Republic has established a prima facie case against the accused person, and I hereby put her on her defence.
RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGATHIS 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022WM MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Erick Zalo, Court Assistant.Ms. Kagai, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the Republic.Ms. Andia, Advocate for the accused person.