[2023] KEHC 20646 (KLR)
The court held that the right to bail is constitutionally guaranteed unless compelling reasons are shown. The prosecution did not present any compelling reasons to deny bail. The pre-bail report indicated the accused was not a flight risk, and there was no likelihood of hostility from the deceased's family. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 20646 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Isaac Maraga
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bomet
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E010 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Application
- Outcome
- Bond granted with conditions.
- Judges
- RL Korir
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond, Presumption of Innocence, Compelling Reasons, Pretrial Release
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Isaac Maraga
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail or bond pending trial for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bail as required by the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the right to bail is constitutionally guaranteed unless compelling reasons are shown. The prosecution did not present any compelling reasons to deny bail. The pre-bail report indicated the accused was not a flight risk, and there was no likelihood of hostility from the deceased's family. The court found that the accused merited release on bond, subject to conditions ensuring attendance at trial and non-interference with witnesses. The bond amount was set at Kshs 500,000 with two sureties of similar amount, reflecting the seriousness of the charge while upholding the accused's constitutional rights.
Court Disposition
Bond granted with conditions.
Orders
- The accused shall execute a personal bond of Kshs 500,000 and provide two sureties of similar amount.
- The accused shall not interfere with prosecution witnesses or derail the trial in any way.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Republic v Maraga (Criminal Case E010 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 20646 (KLR) (20 July 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 20646 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Bomet
Criminal Case E010 of 2023
RL Korir, J
July 20, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Isaac Maraga
Accused
Ruling
1. The Accused was charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code. The particulars are on 25th May 2022, the Accused pleaded not guilty to the charge.
2. Defence Counsel Mr. Leteipa promptly sought an extension of the bond terms earlier granted by the lower court. He stated that they already had a bond of Kshs 70,000/= in a related matter which was Criminal case Number E009 of 2023. Counsel submitted that the Accused had attended the DCI and would be willing to abide by the bond terms. He further submitted that there were no compelling reasons to deny the Accused bond.
3. Mr. Njeru Prosecution Counsel submitted that the bond of Kshs 70,000/= was not commensurate to the offence. While not opposing the Application for bond, he urged the court to enhance the terms.
4. Bail and bond are constitutional rights provided under Article 49(1) (h) of the Constitution. The provision is clear that, unless there is some compelling reason, an Accused person ought to be released on bail, as a matter of right. It provides that: -“An arrested person has the right - to be released on bond or bail on reasonable conditions pending a charge or trial unless there are compelling reasons not to be released.”
5. In the Bail and Bond Policy Guidelines at Paragraph 3. 1 (a), it is recommended that: -“………Every accused person shall be presumed innocent (Article 50(2) of the Constitution). This is the primary rationale for the requirement of the Constitution that an arrested person has the right to be released on bail or bond.The presumption of innocence dictates that accused persons should be released on bail or bond whenever possible. The presumption of innocence also means that pretrial detention should not constitute punishment, and the fact that accused persons are not convicts should be reflected in their treatment and management. For example, accused persons should not be subject to the same rules and regulations as convicts…….”
6. In addition, the Bail and Bond Policy Guidelines, at Paragraph 4. 9 states that: -In terms of substance, the primary factor considered by the courts in bail decision-making is whether the accused person will appear for trial if granted bail. A particular challenge the courts face since the promulgation of the Constitution of 2010 is determining the existence of compelling reasons for denying an accused person bail, particularly in serious offences……..
7. It is the duty of the Prosecution to bring to the attention of the Court the existence of any compelling reasons to deny the Accused bail. In Republicvs.Danson Mgunya & Another (2010) eKLR the court stated:-“……I do hold that if the prosecutor objects to the release of the Accused from detention during the pendency of a trial, then at the first instance, the burden should be on the prosecution and not the accused person to prove or at least demonstrate the existence of the “compelling reasons”.
8. In this case the Prosecution has not brought forth any compelling reasons.
9. A pre bail report in respect of the Accused was filed by the Probation officer on 26th June 2023. The report states that the Accused and the deceased were formerly students at Bomet University and were in a relationship. That their respective families were not known to each other. The Report further made an assessment that the Accused was not flight risk.
10. I have considered the Application. As earlier stated, the Application was not opposed by the Prosecution. With respect to the victims, I have taken into account the fact that the Accused if released would go to his home in Kisii County and there was no likelihood of hostility from the deceased’s family who live in Nyandarua County.
11. In the end, I find that the Accused merits to be released on bond/bail. He is granted bond on the following conditions: -i.He shall execute a personal bond of Kshs 500,000/= and provide 2 sureties of similar amount.ii.He shall not interfere with prosecution witness or derail the trial in any way.iii.He shall attend Court whenever required.
12Orders accordingly.
RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT BOMET THIS 20THDAY OF JULY, 2023. .........................R. LAGAT-KORIRJUDGERuling delivered in the presence of Mr. Njeru for the State, Mr. Leteipa for the 1St Accused and holding brief for Mr. Odundo for the 2nd Accused and Siele (Court Assistant)