[2007] KEHC 2059 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution failed to provide any valid reason for a further adjournment, having already been granted a final adjournment six months prior and making no demonstrable effort to secure witnesses. The accused had been in custody for nearly three years without progress in the trial, which...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 2059 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Martin Nyongesa Wefwafwa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bungoma
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 72 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Application for Adjournment and Discharge of Accused
- Outcome
- Application for adjournment refused; accused discharged and released.
- Legal Topics
- Right to Fair Trial, Adjournment of Proceedings, Presumption of Innocence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Martin Nyongesa Wefwafwa
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Application for Adjournment and Discharge of Accused
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has provided sufficient reasons for further adjournment of the trial.
- 2 Whether continued detention of the accused without prosecution witnesses violates the right to a fair and speedy trial.
- 3 Whether the accused should be discharged due to prosecutorial delay.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution failed to provide any valid reason for a further adjournment, having already been granted a final adjournment six months prior and making no demonstrable effort to secure witnesses. The accused had been in custody for nearly three years without progress in the trial, which constituted a violation of his constitutional right to a fair and speedy trial. The court held that justice requires balancing the interests of both the accused and the public, and that continued detention without prosecution action is unjust. Accordingly, the court exercised its inherent powers to refuse the adjournment, discharge the accused, and order his release unless otherwise...
Court Disposition
Application for adjournment refused; accused discharged and released.
Orders
- Application for adjournment is refused.
- The accused is discharged and shall be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA
Criminal Case 72 of 2004
REPUBLIC…………………………………………………..PROSECUTOR
VS
MARTIN NYONGESA WEFWAFWA…………...……..……….ACCUSED
RULING OF THE COURT
Even as at the time the State Counsel is sitting down after his reply, he has not informed the court why there are no witnesses in court today. He, himself is on record as having requested for the last (final) adjournment on 24. 1.2007, i.e 6 months ago. He has not told us why 6 months down the line not even a single witness is available.
Justice must balance both sides of the scales. The accused person has been in custody for almost 3 years now. Last time, the State Counsel informed the court that the witnesses could not be traced. He has not told us what efforts have been made to trace them or what chances there are that they will be traced. The accused person cannot be detained in custody forever at the whims of the prosecution, more importantly, adjournments should not be granted as a matter of course even when it is evident that the police (I.O) are sleeping on their job and are not making any efforts to have the witnesses come to court.
An accused person is presumed innocent until he is proven guilty. He also has an inalienable right to a fair and speedy trial. It is the duty of the court to ensure that those rights are not trampled upon by the state.
My view is that the interests of justice demand that this matter should not be adjourned further. Indeed I have not been given any reasons why the same should be adjourned further. I realize that this is a very serious charge where a life was lost. This is the more reason why the prosecutor should have taken the matter more seriously and bonded the witnesses.
My sense of justice demands that this wrongful incarnation of the accused person be brought to an end.
Accordingly, the application for adjournment is hereby refused. The court is hereby discharges the accused person and directs that he should be set at liberty unless he is otherwise lawfully held. He should also not be charged with any offence on the same facts. These orders are made in accordance with the inherent power of this court as bestowed on me by section 60 of the Constitution of Kenya
W. KARANJA
JUDGE
24/7/2007
ORDER: Assessors be paid their allowance for today.
W. KARANJA
JUDGE
COURT: Ruling be typed. A certified copy thereof be supplied to the State Counsel, PCIO, Western Province and DCIO, Bungoma to note.
They are put on notice that if they do not pull up their socks, such laxity will be met with similar measures.