[2017] KEHC 217 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence through its witnesses to establish a prima facie case against the accused. As a result, the accused is required to be put on her defence in accordance with the law. The ruling does not determine guilt but merely finds that the evidence presented,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 217 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Mary Atai Mun'gau
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 94 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case
- Outcome
- Accused to be put on her defence.
- Judges
- JV Juma
- Legal Topics
- Murder Charge, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Mary Atai Mun'gau
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant her being put on her defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence through its witnesses to establish a prima facie case against the accused. As a result, the accused is required to be put on her defence in accordance with the law. The ruling does not determine guilt but merely finds that the evidence presented, if unchallenged, would be sufficient to sustain a conviction. The accused is therefore called upon to present her defence to the charge of murder.
Court Disposition
Accused to be put on her defence.
Orders
- The accused shall give her defence to the charge of murder.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 94 OF 2012
REPUBLIC....................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
MARY ATAI MUN’GAU......................ACCUSED
RULING
The accused MARY ATAI MUN’GAU faces a charge of MURDER CONTRARY TO SECTION 203 as read with SECTION 204 OF THE PENAL CODE.
The accused pleaded ‘Not Guilty’to the charge. The prosecution called a total of four (4) witnesses.
I have considered the evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses. I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been established. I therefore direct that the accused shall given her defence to this charge.
Dated and delivered in Nakuru this 16th day of June, 2017.
Mr. Langat holding brief for Mr. Mongeri
Court– Hearing 11/7/2017 for defence.
Maureen A. Odero
Judge