[2024] KEELRC 13495 (KLR)
The court found that the ex parte applicant had established entitlement to the orders sought, as the respondent was under a legal obligation to pay the decretal sum and taxed costs following a final judgment and certificate of taxation. There was no evidence of any stay or appeal to justify the respondent's failure...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELRC 13495 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Richard K. Masinde; Applicant: Nairobi City County
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review Application E056 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- B Ongaya
- Legal Topics
- Mandamus Against Public Officer, Enforcement of Judgment, Decretal Sum Recovery
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Richard K. Masinde
Respondent
Nairobi City County
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an order of mandamus should issue to compel the respondent to pay the decretal amount and taxed costs as per the judgment and certificate of taxation.
- 2 Whether there is any legal justification for the respondent's delay or refusal to pay the decretal sum and costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the ex parte applicant had established entitlement to the orders sought, as the respondent was under a legal obligation to pay the decretal sum and taxed costs following a final judgment and certificate of taxation. There was no evidence of any stay or appeal to justify the respondent's failure to pay. The court held that mandamus was the appropriate remedy to compel the respondent, a public authority, to perform its statutory duty and satisfy the judgment debt. The absence of opposition from the respondent further supported the grant of the orders. The court concluded that denying the applicant payment would amount to denying the fruits of judgment, contrary to law...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Order of Mandamus issued compelling the respondent to pay the applicant the decretal amount of Kshs. 2,576,400 as per the judgment delivered on 23.02.2024 in ELRC Suit No. 587 of 2016 at Nairobi and costs of the suit of Kshs. 332,666 as taxed vide Certificate of Taxation dated 30.08.2024.
- The respondent to pay costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Republic v Masinde; Nairobi City County (Exparte Applicant) (Judicial Review Application E056 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 13495 (KLR) (19 December 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELRC 13495 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Judicial Review Application E056 of 2024
B Ongaya, J
December 19, 2024
Between
Republic
Applicant
and
Richard K. Masinde
Respondent
and
Nairobi City County
Exparte Applicant
Judgment
1. The ex parte applicant filed the notice of motion dated 07. 11. 2024 through Anya Kalwa & Company Advocates. It was brought under sections 8 and 9 of the Law Reform Act, Cap. 26, Order 53 rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 and all other enabling provisions of the law. The ex parte applicant seeks the following orders:1. An Order of Mandamus to remove into this Honourable Court and compel the respondent to pay the applicant the decretal amount of Kshs. 2,576,400/= as per the Judgment delivered on 23. 02. 2024 by Hon. Lady Justice Stella Rutto, in ELRC Suit No. 587 of 2016 at Nairobi and costs of the suit of Kshs. 332,666/= as taxed vide Certificate of Taxation dated 30. 08. 2024 by the Hon. Deputy Registrar Employment & Labour Relations Court.2. An order for costs of this application to be provided for.
2. The application was based upon the grounds set out in the ex parte applicant’s statutory statement and verifying affidavit (filed together with the application for leave to file the instant application) both sworn on 25. 10. 2024.
3. The ex parte applicant’s case was as follows:a.The respondent has failed, refused, ignored or neglected to pay the ex parte applicant the decretal amount of Kshs. 2,576,400/= awarded to him vide a Judgment dated 23. 02. 2024 and the cost of the suit of Kshs. 332,666/= as per the Certificate of Taxation dated 30. 08. 2024. b.Consequent to the judgment of the Honourable Court, the applicant drafted a Decree dated 01. 03. 2024, which was presented to the Deputy Registrar for certification and thereafter served upon the respondent for payment. The applicant then prepared his Bill of Costs that the respondent contested in Court and for which contention the Deputy Registrar rendered a ruling on 22. 08. 2024 taxing the same at Kshs. 332,666/=.c.The applicant did a reminder to the respondent through a letter dated 06. 05. 2024, to which the respondent replied in its letter dated 21. 05. 2024 informing the applicant that payment process commenced on 03. 04. 2024. After exercising patience as advised, the applicant drafted another letter dated 13. 09. 2024 reminding the respondent the pending payments and therewith enclosed the certificate of taxation and the bank account number to which payments were to be made. However, the respondent has to date not made the said payments, hence this application.d.There is no pending stay order on the payment of the decretal sum and costs of the suit to warrant the respondent’s exhibited delay in payment. The respondent is denying the applicant his fruit of judgment while being aware that there is no appeal and/or stay pending in any court with competent jurisdiction.
4. The application was not opposed and final submissions were filed for the applicant. The Court returns that the applicant has established the claim and is entitled to the reliefs as prayed for because the respondent is obligated to pay the decretal sum plus costs.In conclusion, the application is hereby allowed as follows:1. The Order of Mandamus hereby issued compelling the respondent to pay the applicant the decretal amount of Kshs. 2,576,400/= as per the Judgment delivered on 23. 02. 2024 by Hon. Lady Justice Stella Rutto, in ELRC Suit No. 587 of 2016 at Nairobi and costs of the suit of Kshs. 332,666/= as taxed vide Certificate of Taxation dated 30. 08. 2024 by the Hon. Deputy Registrar Employment & Labour Relations Court.2. The respondent to pay costs of the application.
SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED BY VIDEO-LINK AND IN COURT AT NAIROBI THIS THURSDAY 19THDECEMBER 2024. BYRAM ONGAYAPRINCIPAL JUDGE