[2018] KEHC 3617 (KLR)
Although bail is a constitutional right, it is not absolute and may be denied where compelling reasons exist. In this case, the pre-bail reports indicated that the local community remained hostile towards the accused persons following the alleged murder, creating a real risk to their safety if released. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 3617 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: The Republic; Defendant: Matayo MMbwanga Kingiri alias Kobu; Defendant: Kennedy Ayiga Isumba alias Kenoh
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 39 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application
- Outcome
- Bail denied at this stage; accused to remain in remand custody.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Bail Application, Murder Charge, Pre Trial Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Applicant
Matayo MMbwanga Kingiri alias Kobu
Defendant
Kennedy Ayiga Isumba alias Kenoh
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused persons should be admitted to bail pending trial for murder.
- 2 Whether there exist compelling reasons to deny bail under Article 49 of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
Although bail is a constitutional right, it is not absolute and may be denied where compelling reasons exist. In this case, the pre-bail reports indicated that the local community remained hostile towards the accused persons following the alleged murder, creating a real risk to their safety if released. The court found that, in the interests of the accused's own safety, it would not be appropriate to admit them to bail at this stage. The accused were therefore ordered to remain in remand custody, with liberty to renew their application for bail after six months.
Court Disposition
Bail denied at this stage; accused to remain in remand custody.
Orders
- The accused persons shall remain in remand custody.
- The accused may renew their application for bail after six months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 39 OF 2018
THE REPUBLIC............................................PROSECUTION COUNSEL
VERSUS
MATAYO MMBWANGA KINGIRI alias KOBU...............1ST ACCUSED
KENNEDY AYIGA ISUMBA alias KENOH......................2ND ACCUSED
RULING
1. Matayo MMbwanga Kingiri alias Kobu and Kennedy Ayiga Isumba alias Kenoh are charged with murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code, Cap 63, Laws of Kenya, as read with section 204 thereof. The particulars of the offence allege that on 13th day of July 2018 at Itegero Village, Itegero Sub-Location of Busali East Location, Sabatia Sub-County in Vihiga County, they murdered Cynthia Kageha. They all pleaded not guilty to the charge on 31st July 2018.
2. They applied, through Mr Musiega, their defence counsel, to be admitted to bail. The state did not objected to the release of the accused persons on bail, but asked the court to call for pre-bail reports before bail was considered. Whereupon the court ordered the Probation Department to file pre-bail reports on them. .
3. Pre-trial bail is a constitutional right available for all criminal offences by virtue of Article 49 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. The right is, however, not an absolute. It is available at the discretion of the court to be granted based on the circumstances of each case. Article 49 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, states that a court may admit an accused person on reasonable bail terms, and that bail may be denied where there exist compelling reasons. Section 123 of the Criminal Procedure Code Cap 175, Laws of Kenya, has similar provisions.
4. The principles for determining applications were set out in Nganga vs. Republic (1985) KLR 451 and Mazrui vs. Republic (1985) KLR 279. As a general principle, an accused person should be admitted to bail unless it is shown by the prosecution that there exist grounds for denying the same. The general principle is underpinned by the presumption of innocence. It will usually be denied where it is shown that (a) the accused will fail to turn up at his trial or to surrender to custody, or (b) the accused may commit further offences, or (c) he will obstruct the course of justice and (d) the accused would lose more by absconding. It will also be denied if it would not be favourable for the accused to go back to his own community without risk to his own life or limb.
5. The Probation Department complied with the directions mentioned in paragraph 2 here above, by filing the requisite reports, both dated 19th September 2018. I have perused through the said pre-bail reports. The reports are generally not favourable. The local community is said to be still hostile towards the accused persons after the events of 13th July 2018. It may not be safe, in the circumstances, for the accused to be released back to the community yet, for their own safety.
6. In view of the above, I shall not admit them to bail at this stage, I shall instead direct that they remain in remand custody. They may renew their application for bail after six (6) months.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT THIS 8TH DAY OCTOBER, 2018
W MUSYOKA
JUDGE