[2017] KEHC 2790 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had presented credible and sufficient evidence, including eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, directly linking the accused to the act that caused the deceased's death. The court applied the principle that a prima facie case requires more than a mere scintilla of evidence...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 2790 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Mathew Onsongo Ikobe
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 110 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on a Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused placed on his defence; case to answer established.
- Judges
- WA Okwany
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Standard of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Mathew Onsongo Ikobe
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on a Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence presented links the accused to the death of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had presented credible and sufficient evidence, including eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, directly linking the accused to the act that caused the deceased's death. The court applied the principle that a prima facie case requires more than a mere scintilla of evidence and must be credible and weighty enough to warrant putting the accused on his defence. The identification of the accused at the scene and the cause of death established by the post mortem report satisfied the threshold for a case to answer. Consequently, the accused was placed on his defence to respond to the charge of murder.
Court Disposition
Accused placed on his defence; case to answer established.
Orders
- The accused is placed on his defence to answer the charge of murder.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 110 OF 2014
REPUBLIC………………...………………...…..PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
MATHEW ONSONGO IKOBE……….……………....ACCUSED
RULING ON A CASE TO ANSWER
1. The accused person herein, MATHEW ONSONGO IKOBE, was charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence were that on 22nd November 2014 at Nyabworoba village in Sensi Sub-Location in Marani District within Kisii County murdered NICHOLAS AMINGA IKOBE.
2. The standard of proof on whether or not the prosecution has established a prima facie case was set in the case of Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt -Vs- Republic (1957) E.A. 332 as follows:
"(i) The onus is on the prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and a prima facie case is not made out if at the close of the prosecution, the case is merely one which on full consideration might possibly be thought sufficient to sustain a conviction.
(ii) The question whether there is a case to answer cannot depend only on whether there is 'some' evidence irrespective of its credibility or weight sufficient to put the accused on his defence. A mere scintilla of evidence can never be enough; nor can any amount of worthless discredited evidence."
3. In the instant case, the prosecution presented a total of 8 witnesses whose evidence was that on 22nd November 2014 the accused who was a cousin to the deceased had a verbal confrontation with PW1, Naomi Aminga Kwamboka over a kiosk, which degenerated into a physical duel. PW1 reported the incident to the deceased who then sought the assistance of his brothers PW5, Elijah Boni Nyangoya and PW6 Isaac Okinyi Nyangoya who accompanied him to the scene of the confrontation, but as they were on their way, the accused threw a stone at the deceased. The stone hit the deceased on the left side of his chest and he fell down after which he was rushed to hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival.
4. PW2, PW3 and PW4 responded to the commotion that had been raised by the assault on deceased and assisted in ferrying him to hospital. PW7 was the investigating officer while PW8 was the doctor who produced the post mortem report that established the cause of death to be blunt chest trauma associated with cardiac arrest.
5. A summary of the evidence tendered by the prosecution witnesses links the accused to the death of the deceased. PW5 testified that he saw the accused hit the deceased with a stone and that the stone hit the deceased on the chest.
6. I have evaluated the evidence on record. In my view, a prima facie case has been established against the accused person who was identified at the scene by PW5.
7. From the evidence on record, I am satisfied, without saying much at this stage, for obvious reasons, that a prima facie case has been made out against the accused persons, sufficient enough to require him to answer to the charge. The accused person is accordingly placed on his defence.
Delivered, dated and signed in at Kisii on 19th of September 2017.
W. A. OKWANY
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Otieno for the State
Mr. Nyagwencha for the Accused
Omwoyo court clerk