[2018] KEHC 1349 (KLR)
The court found that although the accused is presumed innocent and generally entitled to bail, the safety of the accused could not be guaranteed if released, given the palpable anger and threats of revenge from the victim's family as indicated in the pre-bail report and supported by the area chief's opinion. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 1349 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Mercy Wanjiru Kariuki
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 29 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Bail Application Ruling
- Outcome
- bail_refused
- Judges
- K Kimondo
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Compelling Reasons, Victims Rights, Pre Bail Report
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Mercy Wanjiru Kariuki
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Bail Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny bail, including the safety of the accused and the views of the victim's family.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the accused is presumed innocent and generally entitled to bail, the safety of the accused could not be guaranteed if released, given the palpable anger and threats of revenge from the victim's family as indicated in the pre-bail report and supported by the area chief's opinion. The court held that this constituted a compelling reason to deny bail under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution. The court also considered the welfare of the accused's young child and her medical condition, directing that the case be fast-tracked, but ultimately refused the application for bail to protect the accused's safety.
Court Disposition
bail_refused
Orders
- The application for bail is refused.
- The case is to be fast-tracked in view of the accused's medical condition and the welfare of her young son.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 29 OF 2018
REPUBLIC....................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
MERCY WANJIRU KARIUKI...........................ACCUSED
RULING
1. The accused prays for bail pending trial. The notice of motion is dated 22nd October 2018.
2. The application is contested by the Republic.
3. There is filed a comprehensive pre-bail report dated 22nd October 2018. In a nutshell, the report is negative.
4. Learned counsel for the accused challenged the report. She submitted that the accused is aged 25. She is a single mother. The child is aged 5 years. She recently underwent surgery in prison and her wounds have not healed. Counsel submitted that the locus in quo cannot is not hostile as alleged in the report because the accused used to travel there from her work place in Athi River. She was only arrested a year after the homicide.
5. The learned Prosecution Counsel submitted that the family of the deceased remains bitter; that there is no medical evidence to support the claims by the accused; and, that there are compelling reasons for denial of bail.
6. The accused faces the grave charge of murder; but she is still deemed innocent. Under Article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution, she is entitled to bail pending trial unless there are compelling circumstances. See Muraguri v Republic [1989] KLR 181, Republic v Elias Kipkemoi, Eldoret High Court Criminal Case 42 of 2014 (unreported).
7. The overarching objective of bail is to ensure the accused attends his trial. Muraguri v Republic [1989] KLR 181. Relevant matters to be considered by the court include: the nature of the charge; the likely sentence; previous criminal records, the views of the family of the victim, the possibility of interference with witnesses; the temptation to abscond; and, the safety of the accused.
8. The accused is charged for the unlawful killing of John Paul Maina Macharia on 11th August 2017 at Mairi Trading Centre, Kigumo.
9. It is true that the accused is a single mother of a young child aged 5 years. I do not think she lied about the surgery in prison. But I cannot dismiss off-hand the findings in the social report. The deceased for example is alleged to be her lover. There is palpable anger at the victim’s home. The father of the deceased has threatened to revenge if the accused is released on bail. There is a parallel opinion by the area chief.
10. The Victims Protection Act 2014 requires the views of victim’s family to be taken into account at this stage.
11. I commiserate with the accused. But I have reached the conclusion that her safety is not guaranteed at the locus in quo. That to me is a compelling reason not to release the accused on bail.
12. The application for bail is refused. I however direct that this case be fast-tracked in view of the medical condition of the accused; and, the welfare of her young son. I direct the Deputy Registrar to allocate a hearing date not later than the new court term.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNEDandDELIVEREDatMURANG’Athis 13th day of December 2018.
KANYI KIMONDO
JUDGE
Ruling read in open court in the presence of-
Accused.
Ms. Muritu for the accused.
Ms. Gichuru for the Republic.
Ms. Dorcas and Ms. Elizabeth, Court Clerks.