[2018] KEELC 2638 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 2638 (KLR)

The court declined to grant the order for removal of the caution because the issue was not pleaded in the judicial review motion or its supporting documents. The court further held that it was not aware of the circumstances under which the caution was lodged, and therefore could not grant the orders sought. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 2638 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Meru Central District Dispute Tribunal; Respondent: Chief Magistrate Court (Meru); Respondent: Betty Kagwiria; Respondent: Mary Gacheri Mereria; Respondent: Samson Mugambi Mwereria; Applicant: M'Mwereria M'Rinkanya
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 53 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Remove Caution
Outcome
application disallowed
Legal Topics
Land Caution, Removal of Caution, Judicial Review Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Caution Removal of Caution Judicial Review Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Meru Central District Dispute Tribunal

Respondent

Chief Magistrate Court (Meru)

Respondent

Betty Kagwiria

Respondent

Mary Gacheri Mereria

Respondent

Samson Mugambi Mwereria

Respondent

M'Mwereria M'Rinkanya

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Remove Caution

  1. 1 Whether the court can grant an order for removal of a caution not pleaded in the judicial review motion.
  2. 2 Whether the circumstances under which the caution was lodged are within the court's knowledge in these proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to grant the order for removal of the caution because the issue was not pleaded in the judicial review motion or its supporting documents. The court further held that it was not aware of the circumstances under which the caution was lodged, and therefore could not grant the orders sought. The application was thus disallowed as the matter was not properly before the court and the necessary factual basis was lacking.

Court Disposition

application disallowed

Orders

  • The application for removal of the caution is disallowed.