[2014] KEHC 8646 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 8646 (KLR)

The court found that the ex-parte applicant had died and that Florence Riinya had been duly appointed as the legal representative. Since all parties did not oppose the application for substitution, and the requirements for substitution under Order 24 of the Civil Procedure Rules had been met, the court allowed the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 8646 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Meru Central District Land Disputes Tribunal; Interested Party: Jamlick Muthomi M'Arimi; Ex Parte Applicant: Kireria Kirurui (deceased) / Florence Riinya (legal representative)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 29 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Substitution of Ex Parte Applicant Due to Death
Outcome
Application for substitution allowed; costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Substitution of Parties, Land Disputes, Legal Representative Appointment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Judicial Review Substitution of Parties Land Disputes Legal Representative Appointment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Meru Central District Land Disputes Tribunal

Respondent

Jamlick Muthomi M'Arimi

Interested Party

Kireria Kirurui (deceased) / Florence Riinya (legal representative)

Ex Parte Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Substitution of Ex Parte Applicant Due to Death

  1. 1 Whether the court should substitute the deceased ex-parte applicant with their legal representative for purposes of prosecuting the pending matter.
  2. 2 Whether costs should be provided for the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the ex-parte applicant had died and that Florence Riinya had been duly appointed as the legal representative. Since all parties did not oppose the application for substitution, and the requirements for substitution under Order 24 of the Civil Procedure Rules had been met, the court allowed the application. The court further ordered that costs be in the cause, reflecting the unopposed and procedural nature of the application.

Court Disposition

Application for substitution allowed; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Florence Riinya is substituted as the ex-parte applicant in place of Kireria Kirurui (deceased).
  • Costs of the application shall be in the cause.