[2022] KEHC 16936 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 16936 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused person, as he was placed at the scene of the crime by one of the witnesses. This evidence was deemed sufficient to require the accused to be put on his defence, in accordance with the standard set out in Section 306 of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 16936 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Julius Wafula Mikisi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 70 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Outcome
Accused put on his defence.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Trial Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Prima Facie Case Burden of Proof Criminal Trial Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Julius Wafula Mikisi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused person to warrant putting him on his defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused person, as he was placed at the scene of the crime by one of the witnesses. This evidence was deemed sufficient to require the accused to be put on his defence, in accordance with the standard set out in Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code and relevant case law. The court therefore ruled that the accused must be called upon to answer the charge and present his defence.

Court Disposition

Accused put on his defence.

Orders

  • The accused is hereby put on his defence.