[2018] KEELC 4621 (KLR)
The court found that the exparte applicant had failed to comply with multiple court directions, including filing and exchanging submissions and appearing in court as ordered. This indolence and disregard for court orders rendered the prosecution of the suit untenable. The court held that such conduct merited...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELC 4621 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: The Minister, Ministry of Lands, through the Sub-County Administrator Gatunga Adjudication Section; Respondent: The Attorney General; Interested Party: Sophia Gatiria Kimencu
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application 10 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Dismissal for Non Compliance With Court Directions
- Outcome
- suit dismissed for non-compliance with court orders
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Dismissal for Non Compliance, Adjudication Process, Costs Award
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
The Minister, Ministry of Lands, through the Sub-County Administrator Gatunga Adjudication Section
Respondent
The Attorney General
Respondent
Sophia Gatiria Kimencu
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Dismissal for Non Compliance With Court Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the exparte applicant's failure to comply with court directions warrants dismissal of the suit.
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded to the interested party.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the exparte applicant had failed to comply with multiple court directions, including filing and exchanging submissions and appearing in court as ordered. This indolence and disregard for court orders rendered the prosecution of the suit untenable. The court held that such conduct merited dismissal of the suit to uphold the integrity of the judicial process. Costs were awarded to the interested party, who was the only party to comply with the court's directions and attend the hearing.
Court Disposition
suit dismissed for non-compliance with court orders
Orders
- The suit is dismissed.
- Costs are awarded to the interested party.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA MISCELLANEOUS JUDICIAL REVIEW CASE NO. 10 OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW FOR ORDERS OF CERTIORARI
AND
IN THE MATTER OF APPEAL TO THE MINISTER APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2017 IN RESPECT TO L.R. NO. 2340 GATUNGA ADJUDICATION SECTION
REPUBLIC.....................................................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE MINISTER, MINISTRY OF LANDS, THROUGH THE SUB-COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR GATUNGA ADJUDICATION SECTION....1ST RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.........................................................2ND RESPONDENT
SOPHIA GATIRIA KIMENCU...................................................INTERESTED PARTY
RULING
1. When this matter came up for directions on 6th February, 2018, only the interested party, Sophia Gatiria Kimencu turned up. She asked the court to dismiss this suit as the exparte applicant only wanted to subject her to hardship and suffering on account of her poor status.
2. The exparte applicant was not in court. The advocate for the 1st and 2nd respondents was not in court. The advocates representing the exparte applicant and the interested party were also not in court. I deprecate this conduct of the advocates representing the litigants. They are approaching the judicial process in a cavalier manner.
3. On 20th September, 2017 directions were given to the parties in the following terms:
1. Advocate Ogoti at his request granted 14 days to regularize his status and file his response and any documents apposite to the suit.
2. The respondents to file their responses and apposite documents within 14 days of today.
3. The exparte applicant to serve upon the respondents the orders issued by this court within five (5) days of today.
4. After 14 days from today, and within 14 days thereafter, the exparte applicant to file and exchange his submissions concerning the main suit.
5. Within 14 days after receipt of the exparte applicant’s submissions, the respondents and the interested party to file and exchange their submissions.
6. By consent of Miss Wanjohi holding brief for Kimathi Kiara for the exparte applicant and Mr.Ogoti, the intended advocate for the interested party, directions to be taken on 15. 11. 2017.
4. Parties were directed to come to court for directions on 15th November, 2017. All the parties had ignored the court orders issued by this court on 20th September 2017. Directions were issued that parties do come to court for directions on 6th February, 2018.
5. As I have already noted, only the interested party Sophia Gatiri Kimencu came to court. The exparte applicant, the respondent and all advocates representing the various parties did not come to court. As I have already said, I deprecate the cavalier attitude taken by the parties, and their advocates, except the Interested party, in their prosecution of this suit.
6. For disobedience of court orders by the exparte applicant, and because his refusal to file and exchange his submissions may have made it difficult for the other parties to file and exchange their submissions, I find it that he had been veritably indolent to an extent that renders dismissal of this suit meritorious.
7. In the circumstances, this suit is dismissed.
8. Costs are awarded to the interested party.
9. It is so ordered
Delivered in open court at Chuka this 6th day of February, 2018 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Sophia Gatiria Kimencu – interested party
P.M. NJOROGE
JUDGE