[2024] KEHC 4032 (KLR)
The court found that the primary reason for denying bail to the accused was his suicidal tendencies, which have not been addressed or shown to have changed. The applicant's argument regarding the need for specialized medical care was found unpersuasive, as such care could be accessed through referral to appropriate...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 4032 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Vincent Mogaka
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E076 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Application for Review of Bail
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Bail Review, Change of Circumstances, Judicial Discretion, Suicidal Tendencies, Specialized Medical Care
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Vincent Mogaka
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Application for Review of Bail
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there has been a change of circumstances warranting review of the accused's bail denial.
- 2 Whether the accused's medical needs justify release on bail.
- 3 Whether the accused's suicidal tendencies remain a compelling reason to deny bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the primary reason for denying bail to the accused was his suicidal tendencies, which have not been addressed or shown to have changed. The applicant's argument regarding the need for specialized medical care was found unpersuasive, as such care could be accessed through referral to appropriate hospitals while in custody. The court held that there had been no change of circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the earlier order denying bail. Consequently, the application for review of bail was dismissed for lack of merit.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for review of bail is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Republic v Mogaka (Criminal Case E076 of 2021) [2024] KEHC 4032 (KLR) (Crim) (25 April 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 4032 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Criminal
Criminal Case E076 of 2021
LN Mutende, J
April 25, 2024
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Vincent Mogaka
Applicant
Ruling
1. Vincent Mogaka, the accused was denied bail on the ground that he attempted to commit suicide following the alleged murder. The court found that it was in the interest of his safety, to be in prison.
2. Secondly, the court found that the averment that he wanted to be released so as to secure specialized medical care being without merit as he could still access specialized treatment through referral to hospital.
3. It is now urged that the accused is not able to access special meals and his intestines were constricted; hence the plea for review of bail.
4. The application is opposed by the State that submits that specialized treatment was to be secured through Kenyatta National Hospital or Mbagathi Hospital. That the accused was denied bail for his own protection as he was prone to committing suicide, facts that the defence has not touched on.
5. The Judiciary Bail and Bond Policy Guidelines, paragraph 4. 2.6 (h) sets out considerations of granting or declining bond. It also recognizes the fact of change of circumstances that may make a court reconsider Bail/Bond terms.
6. In exercising the discretion bestowed upon the court, the decision reached must be a judicious one.
7. In the case of Republic v Diana Suleiman Said and another 2014 eKLR which is persuasive the court stated that:“……The changed circumstances test is one of common sense that where the circumstances of the case are so altered that compelling reasons are disclosed for the refusal of bail or for review of terms thereof, the court as a court of justice must reserve for itself a power to revisit the issue in the interest of justice not only for the accused but also for the complainant and the society at large. In the same way that an unsuccessful applicant for bail may repeat his application if his circumstances changed in such a manner as to favour his release on bail, so may the prosecution urge that the situation has deteriorated to compel a reconsideration of bail granted to the accused...”
8. The major reason that prompted the court to deny the accused bail is his suicidal tendencies. This issue has not been addressed. Therefore, there have not been any change of circumstances that could make the court review the earlier order.
9. In the result, the application lacks merit. Accordingly, it is dismissed.
10. It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS AT NAIROBI, THIS 25THDAY OF APRIL, 2024. L. N. MUTENDEJUDGE