[2016] KEHC 1784 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1784 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused by calling 8 witnesses and producing several exhibits. The evidence on record was sufficient to require the accused to be put on his defence. Consequently, the court ruled that the accused must be called upon to answer the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 1784 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Mohamed Noor Kassim alias Gaando
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Garissa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 14 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Close of Prosecution Case
Outcome
Accused put on his defence.
Judges
GMA Dulu
Legal Topics
Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Case to Answer
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Prima Facie Case Criminal Procedure Case to Answer

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Mohamed Noor Kassim alias Gaando

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Close of Prosecution Case

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused by calling 8 witnesses and producing several exhibits. The evidence on record was sufficient to require the accused to be put on his defence. Consequently, the court ruled that the accused must be called upon to answer the charge and explained the options available to him under Section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

Accused put on his defence.

Orders

  • The accused is put on his defence.
  • The options available to the accused under Section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code are explained to him.