[2024] KEHC 7534 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against Peter Momanyi and Mary Momanyi for the offence of murder. The DNA evidence did not implicate either accused, as the profiles generated from the blood-stained items did not match those of the accused or the deceased. There was no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 7534 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Peter Momanyi; Defendant: Mary Momanyi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E039 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer
- Outcome
- acquittal
- Judges
- KW Kiarie
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Dna Evidence, Acquittal, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Peter Momanyi
Defendant
Mary Momanyi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case against the accused persons for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether the DNA and other evidence adduced connected the accused persons to the offence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against Peter Momanyi and Mary Momanyi for the offence of murder. The DNA evidence did not implicate either accused, as the profiles generated from the blood-stained items did not match those of the accused or the deceased. There was no other evidence connecting the accused to the offence. In the absence of sufficient evidence, and considering the constitutional right of the accused to remain silent, the court held that no reasonable tribunal could convict on the evidence presented. Accordingly, the accused were acquitted under section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
acquittal
Orders
- Each accused is acquitted of the offence of murder under section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- Each accused is set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Republic v Momanyi & another (Criminal Case E039 of 2022) [2024] KEHC 7534 (KLR) (19 June 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 7534 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisii
Criminal Case E039 of 2022
KW Kiarie, J
June 19, 2024
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Peter Momanyi
1st Accused
Mary Momanyi
2nd Accused
Ruling
1. Peter Momanyi and Mary Momanyi are charged with murder contrary to section 203, as read with section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. The particulars of the offence are that on the 5th day of July 2022, at Orogare village, Orogare sub-location, in Nyamache Sub County within Kisii County, murdered Obadiah Ontugi Getui.
3. The deceased’s body was found in Erick’s land with multiple cuts. Peter Momanyi (accused 1) suspected that the previous day, the two were imbibing alcohol together. When police officers went to his house, they recovered some clothes with some blood stains.
4. Gentrix Vilika Wamboka (PW5) testified that she co-investigated this case with IP Kabogo. Her evidence was that when they went to Orogare village, they searched the house of Peter Momanyi and recovered a blood-stained machete and a green paper bag outside the compound. They later received other blood-stained items from Omosaria police station. These were a white checked shirt, a pair of black trousers, a light green shirt, a white striped shirt, a brown jacket, a petticoat, and a 20-litre yellow jerrycan.
5. The blood samples of the accused persons were taken and, together with the recovered exhibits, were taken for DNA sampling.
6. Mr. P.L. Kweyu, the government analyst, did the analysis on the samples escorted together with the blood samples of the deceased, Peter Momanyi and Mary Momanyi. His conclusion, as captured in the report, is as follows:Based on the findings, the DNA profiles generated from the blood stains:1. On the jacket (item “J”), panga (item “M”), shirt (item “F”) and trousers (item “F”) are similar and belong to a single unknown male person.2. The DNA profile on the petticoat (item” H”) matches that generated from Mary Momanyi's reference blood sample ( suspect).3. The stains on the shirt (item “K”) and the shirt (item “G”) were partial and inconclusive.4. No DNA profile(s) was generated from the stains on the carrier bag (item “L”) and the jerrycan (item” N”).5. The DNA profiles of Dennis Ondieki, David Ondari, Peter Momanyi (all suspects), and Obadiah Ontugi (deceased) did not match any of the DNA profiles generated above.
7. When the DNA profiles generated did not implicate the accused persons, and there was no other evidence connecting them to the offence, it was illogical for the prosecution to charge them.
8. After considering the evidence on record, the question is whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against accused persons. In the Black’s Law Dictionary, 10th Edition, prima facie case is defined as follows:Prima facie case. (1805) I. The establishment of a legally required rebuttable presumption. 2. A party's production of enough evidence to allow the fact-trier to infer the fact at issue and rule in the party's favor.
9. The Court of Appeal in the case of Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt vs R [1957] E.A 332 at 334 and 335 defined prima facie case as follows:It may not be easy to define what is meant by a “prima facie case”, but at least it must mean one on which a reasonable tribunal, properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence could convict if no explanation is offered by the defence.
10. Article 50 (2) (i) of the Constitution of Kenya provides:(2)Every accused person has the right to a fair trial, which includes the right—(i)to remain silent, and not to testify during the proceedings;In the instant case, if the accused persons opt to exercise their constitutional right hereinabove stated, I cannot enter a conviction based on the evidence on record. Therefore, the prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie case against them. I accordingly acquit each of the offence of murder under section 306 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Each accused is set at liberty unless, if otherwise, lawfully held.
DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT KISII ON THIS 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2024. KIARIE WAWERU KIARIEJUDGE