[2023] KEHC 20274 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused, Mathew Wakulwa Mukoya. The judge, having heard all the witnesses and reviewed the record, determined that the evidence presented by the Republic was adequate to require the accused to be put on...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 20274 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Mathew Wakulwa Mukoya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E008 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- The accused is found to have a case to answer and is put on his defence.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Case to Answer, Burden of Proof, Prima Facie Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Mathew Wakulwa Mukoya
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused, Mathew Wakulwa Mukoya. The judge, having heard all the witnesses and reviewed the record, determined that the evidence presented by the Republic was adequate to require the accused to be put on his defence. The ruling is based on the legal standard that if the prosecution's evidence, taken at its highest, could result in a conviction if unchallenged, then the accused must be called upon to answer the case. Accordingly, the accused was found to have a case to answer under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
The accused is found to have a case to answer and is put on his defence.
Orders
- The accused, Mathew Wakulwa Mukoya, is put on his defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
Republic v Mukoya (Criminal Case E008 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 20274 (KLR) (17 July 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 20274 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Busia
Criminal Case E008 of 2022
WM Musyoka, J
July 17, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Mathew Wakulwa Mukoya
Accused
Ruling
1. I have perused the record, and I had the advantage of hearing all the witnesses herein. I am persuaded that the Republic has adduced sufficient evidence, to warrant the accused person being put on his defence. It is my finding that the accused has a case to answer.
RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT BUSIA THIS 17TH DAY OF JULY 2023WM MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant.AppearancesMr. Mayaba, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the Republic.Mr. Olaka, Advocate for the accused person.