[2022] KEHC 13488 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 13488 (KLR)

The court found that, after reviewing the record and hearing the witnesses, the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. Consequently, the accused was put on her defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The ruling did not address the merits of the evidence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 13488 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Judith Iminza Mukuna
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 28 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Outcome
Accused put on her defence.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Trial Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Prima Facie Case Burden of Proof Criminal Trial Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Judith Iminza Mukuna

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused person to warrant her being put on her defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, after reviewing the record and hearing the witnesses, the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. Consequently, the accused was put on her defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The ruling did not address the merits of the evidence but determined that the threshold for a prima facie case had been met, requiring the accused to respond to the prosecution's case.

Court Disposition

Accused put on her defence.

Orders

  • The accused, Judith Iminza Mukuna, is hereby put on her defence.