[2022] KEHC 11363 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had not presented any new evidence or compelling reasons to justify continued denial of bail. The issues previously raised by the prosecution had already been considered and determined by the court in an earlier ruling. No evidence was provided to substantiate claims of ongoing...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 11363 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Benson Melonyie Mungai
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kajiado
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E019 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Application for bail allowed; accused admitted to bail pending trial.
- Judges
- SN Mutuku
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Compelling Reasons, Witness Protection, Interference With Witnesses
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Benson Melonyie Mungai
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be admitted to bail pending the hearing and determination of the murder case.
- 2 Whether the prosecution has advanced new compelling reasons to justify continued denial of bail.
- 3 Whether there is evidence of interference with witnesses by the accused or his associates.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had not presented any new evidence or compelling reasons to justify continued denial of bail. The issues previously raised by the prosecution had already been considered and determined by the court in an earlier ruling. No evidence was provided to substantiate claims of ongoing investigations or interference with witnesses. In the absence of new material or substantiated compelling reasons, the court held that the accused was entitled to bail pending trial, subject to conditions to ensure attendance and non-interference with the trial process.
Court Disposition
Application for bail allowed; accused admitted to bail pending trial.
Orders
- The accused shall deposit a bond of KES 2,000,000 with two sureties each.
- Each surety shall deposit a bond worth KES 1,000,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Republic v Mungai (Criminal Case E019 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 11363 (KLR) (22 March 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 11363 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kajiado
Criminal Case E019 of 2021
SN Mutuku, J
March 22, 2022
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Benson Melonyie Mungai
Accused
Ruling
1. The accused herein is charged with murder contrary tosection 203 as read withsection 204 of the Penal Code. It is stated in the particulars of the offence that on 7th day of August 2021 at Mkamurieki Village within Kitengela Township in Kajiado East Sub-County, jointly with others not before the court, he murdered Micah George, Nicholas Muia, Victor Muriithi and Frederick Muriithi.
2. The accused approached this court to be admitted to bail pending the hearing and determination of this case. In a ruling delivered on October 26, 2021, this court declined to admit the accused to bail. This court, in declining that prayer, allowed the police 45 days from the date of that ruling to conclude protecting any witnesses that required protection and to conclude investigations in this matter. I directed that at the end of 45 days, the accused was at liberty to move the court to consider admitting him to bail. I stated that the accused need not file an application for that purpose.
3. An application dated December 20, 2021has been filed, nonetheless, seeking bail. The prosecution did not respond to the application but made submissions on it during the hearing of the application on February 22, 2022.
4. In his brief submissions Mr Naeku for the accused told the court that the 45 days allowed to the state had expired when this court was on leave and that it is now over 100 days since the order of this court allowing state 45 days to finalize the investigations was granted; that the accused remains in custody; that the state has not responded to the application and therefore this court ought to release the accused from custody.
5. The prosecution opposed the application. It was submitted that investigations were still on-going and that some suspects are still at large and are yet to be arrested. It was argued that the state had advanced compelling reasons for denial of bail as shown in the replying affidavit filed herein. Further, it was argued that the Witness Protection Agency is still vetting witnesses to be protected. It was further argued that there was information that some persons associated with the accused were attempting to interfere with witnesses. This court was asked to decline granting bail to the accused.
6. In a rejoinder, Mr Naeku for the accused told the court that the prosecution was advancing reasons that have already been considered by the court and that no evidence has been tendered in court to proof tendered in court on the status of the investigations. On the issue of interference with witnesses, Mr Naeku submitted that there is no evidence provided.
7. I have considered this matter. It is true that the issues raised by the prosecution have already been raised earlier and this court has already pronounced itself on those issues. As far as this court is concerned, there is no new evidence tabled in court to establish what the investigators are doing. In short this court has not been given anything new to work with. All the issues raised by the prosecutor have been dealt with and this court has already pronounced itself.
8. Without wasting time, I proceed to allow this application and hereby admit the accused to bail pending the hearing and determination of this case. The terms and conditions of bail are as follows:1. The accused shall deposit a bond of Kenya Shilling Two million (Kshs 2,000,000) with two sureties each. Each surety shall deposit bond worth Kenya Shillings One Million (Kshs 1,000,000. )2. The accused shall attend all court sessions without fail.3. The accused shall not do anything that may jeopardise the fair hearing of this case including interfering with witnesses or doing any act that may compromise fair trial.Orders shall issue accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 22ND MARCH 2022. S. N. MUTUKUJUDGE