[2025] KEHC 10416 (KLR)
Upon consideration of the evidence adduced by the five prosecution witnesses and the submissions of counsel, including the principles on the application of dying declarations and the ingredients of the offence of murder, the court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 10416 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Stephen Waweru Muriu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2025
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 15 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer Under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and called upon to make his defence.
- Judges
- EM Muriithi
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Dying Declaration, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Stephen Waweru Muriu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer Under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant his being put on his defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence adduced meets the threshold under section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code for a case to answer in a murder trial.
Ratio Decidendi
Upon consideration of the evidence adduced by the five prosecution witnesses and the submissions of counsel, including the principles on the application of dying declarations and the ingredients of the offence of murder, the court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. The evidence, if uncontroverted, could lead to a conviction. Therefore, in accordance with section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the accused is required to be put on his defence. The court refrained from giving detailed reasons at this stage to avoid prejudicing the fair trial of the accused, as established in binding precedent.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and called upon to make his defence.
Orders
- The accused shall be called upon to make his defence under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- Directions for the Defence hearing shall be taken.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment