[2024] KEHC 13192 (KLR)
The court found that, based on the evidence adduced by the prosecution through 10 witnesses, a prima facie case had been established against the accused, Mzhamin Noor Mustafa alias Mzae. The court emphasized that at this stage, it is not required to determine whether the prosecution has proved its case beyond...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 13192 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Mzhamin Noor Mustafa alias Mzae
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E014 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Close of Prosecution Case
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and placed on his defence.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Presumption of Innocence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Mzhamin Noor Mustafa alias Mzae
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Close of Prosecution Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant him being placed on his defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence adduced by the prosecution meets the threshold required at this stage under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, based on the evidence adduced by the prosecution through 10 witnesses, a prima facie case had been established against the accused, Mzhamin Noor Mustafa alias Mzae. The court emphasized that at this stage, it is not required to determine whether the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, but only whether there is sufficient evidence to require the accused to be put on his defence. The court further noted that the presumption of innocence remains and that the accused is not obliged to testify. Accordingly, the accused was found to have a case to answer and was placed on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and placed on his defence.
Orders
- The accused, Mzhamin Noor Mustafa alias Mzae, is found to have a case to answer and is placed on his defence.
- Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 50(2)(i)(k)(l) of the Constitution are read out and explained to the accused in the presence of his counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
Republic v Mustafa alias Mzae (Criminal Case E014 of 2021) [2024] KEHC 13192 (KLR) (29 October 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 13192 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Criminal Case E014 of 2021
RE Aburili, J
October 29, 2024
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Mzhamin Noor Mustafa alias Mzae
Accused
Ruling
1. The accused person Mzhamin Noor Mustafa alias Mzae is charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. Particulars of the offence as per the Information dated 29th day of April 2021 are that on the 21st day of March 2021 at PlainLand Hotel, Kondele area in Kisumu Central Sub-county within Kisumu County, the accused person murdered Kennedy Onyango Ndeda.
3. The accused took plea on 15th May 2021 and denied committing the offence. He was granted bond of Kshs.250,000 plus two sureties of similar amount and on 20th May 2021, he was released on bond pending trial.
4. The prosecution has called a total of 10 witnesses who have testified and now the duty of this court is to determine, based on the evidence adduced, whether the prosecution has made out a prima facie case against the accused person to warrant him to be placed on his defence.
5. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution throughout the trial to establish the guilt of the accused person and the standard of proof is beyond reasonable doubt.
6. However, at this stage, the court cannot rule on whether the prosecution has proved its case against the accused person beyond reasonable doubt.
7. All that is required is a prima facie case established against the accused.
8. The accused person is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Further, even if he is placed on his defence, he is not obliged to testify as his right to remain silent and not to given self-incriminating evidence is constitutionally guaranteed and cannot be limited.
9. What that implies is that even if an accused is found with a case to answer, that does not mean that he is guilty of the offence charged.
10. On the other hand, should the court be of the view that a prima facie case has been established, it should not give a detailed analysis of the evidence justifying the prima facie case as that might prejudice the accused.
11. In this case, and without delving deep into the evidence adduced by the 10 prosecution witnesses, I am satisfied that a prima facie case is established against the accused person herein Mzhamin Noor Mustafa alias Mzae who is hereby found to have a case to answer and is hereby placed on his defence.
12. Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code as read with Article 50(2) (i) (k) (l) of the Constitution are hereby read out to the accused person and explained to him in the presence of his counsel Mr. Onsongo.
13. I so order.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 29THDAY OF OCTOBER, 2024R. E. ABURILIJUDGE