[2022] KEHC 14705 (KLR)
The court considered the mitigation advanced by the accused, including his role as the sole breadwinner, his remorse, the lack of premeditation, and the familial context of the offence. However, the court found that the loss of life is a grave matter that warrants a substantial custodial sentence. The Victim Impact...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 14705 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Francis Stephen Musyoka
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E018 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentence
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Judges
- A. Ong’injo
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Manslaughter, Mitigation, Victim Impact Statement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Francis Stephen Musyoka
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for the accused convicted of causing the death of a family member?
- 2 Should the accused's mitigation, including remorse and family circumstances, affect the sentence imposed?
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the mitigation advanced by the accused, including his role as the sole breadwinner, his remorse, the lack of premeditation, and the familial context of the offence. However, the court found that the loss of life is a grave matter that warrants a substantial custodial sentence. The Victim Impact Statement was also taken into account, reflecting the suffering of the deceased's family. Balancing these factors, the court determined that a sentence of 20 years' imprisonment was appropriate, to run from the date the accused was arraigned. The sentence aims to serve both punitive and rehabilitative purposes, reflecting the seriousness of the offence while acknowledging the...
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to serve 20 years imprisonment to run from November 30, 2020.
- Right of appeal within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Republic v Musyoka (Criminal Case E018 of 2020) [2022] KEHC 14705 (KLR) (21 October 2022) (Sentence)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 14705 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Mombasa
Criminal Case E018 of 2020
A. Ong’injo, J
October 21, 2022
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Francis Stephen Musyoka
Accused
Sentence
MitigationWe submit for a lenient sentence for the following 3 reasons:- 1. a.The accused is the only bread winner and he’s elderly parents heavily rely on him to cater for their basic needs.
2. b.The accused is remorseful of his actions that led to the unfortunate events that occurred. The death was not pre-meditate.
3. c.This being an incident that occurred between members of the same family. My client has sought forgiveness from the family members of his uncle. He is well aware of his actions and ripple effects it has caused. He has learnt his lessons and will not repeat offence.
4. d.Given the action was committed without predetermined mind we pray for a lenient sentence.
Order 5. This court has considered the accused persons mitigation as well as the contents of the Victim Impact Statement and finds that a life having been lost, the accused deserves a commensurate punishment.
6. He is sentenced to serve 20 years Imprisonment to run from November 30, 2020 when he was arraigned in court.
7. Right of Appeal – 14 days.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT THIS 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2022HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGELater at 12:37 pmOgwel - Court AssistantMs Kambaga for StateMr. Motuka for AccusedAccused - Present in Person