[2010] KEHC 3386 (KLR)
The court, after reviewing the evidence on record, determined that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. This finding necessitated that the accused be placed on his defence in accordance with Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judge was satisfied that the evidence...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 3386 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Mutangili Katiwa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 30 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- accused found to have a case to answer; placed on defence
- Judges
- I Lenaola
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Criminal Trial Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Mutangili Katiwa
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court, after reviewing the evidence on record, determined that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. This finding necessitated that the accused be placed on his defence in accordance with Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judge was satisfied that the evidence presented met the threshold required at this stage of the proceedings, justifying the continuation of the trial and the calling of the accused to answer the charges.
Court Disposition
accused found to have a case to answer; placed on defence
Orders
- The accused is found to have a case to answer and is placed on his defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
CRIMINAL CASE 30 OF 2005
REPUBLIC
VS
MUTANGILI KATIWA ........................................ACCUSED
RULING
I have now read the evidence on record and I am satisfied that a prima-facie case has been made out against the accused person.
I find that he has a case to answer and I will place him on his defence.
Orders accordingly.
Dated and delivered at Machakos this 5th day of February 2010.
Isaac Lenaola
Judge
In the presence of; Mr. Omirera for Republic
Mr. Kimeu for accused
Isaac Lenaola
Judge