[2009] KEHC 932 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 932 (KLR)

The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal acted outside its statutory jurisdiction by purporting to determine ownership of registered land and directing the revocation of a Title Deed. Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act restricts the Tribunal's mandate to matters involving division, boundary...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 932 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Eliud Warui; Respondent: The Chairman, Nyeri Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee; Respondent: The Chairman, Mwea Divisional Land Disputes Tribunal; Respondent: The Senior Resident Magistrate Wang’uru; Respondent: Bernard Wanjohi Kang’ara
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Judicial Review Appeal 27 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed. Award and decree quashed. Costs to applicant.
Judges
J Karanja
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Registered Land Ownership, Quashing of Tribunal Awards, Certiorari and Prohibition
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal Registered Land Ownership Quashing of Tribunal Awards Certiorari and Prohibition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eliud Warui

Applicant

The Chairman, Nyeri Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee

Respondent

The Chairman, Mwea Divisional Land Disputes Tribunal

Respondent

The Senior Resident Magistrate Wang’uru

Respondent

Bernard Wanjohi Kang’ara

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine matters of ownership of registered land.
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal could lawfully revoke or interfere with a Title Deed.
  3. 3 Whether the resultant decree of the Senior Resident Magistrate based on the Tribunal's award was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal acted outside its statutory jurisdiction by purporting to determine ownership of registered land and directing the revocation of a Title Deed. Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act restricts the Tribunal's mandate to matters involving division, boundary determination, occupation, or trespass to land, but not ownership or title. The power to cancel or rectify a Title Deed is vested solely in the High Court under Section 143 of the Registered Land Act. The Tribunal's award and the decree of the Senior Resident Magistrate, being founded on an act without jurisdiction, were null and void. The court therefore quashed both the award and...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Award and decree quashed. Costs to applicant.

Orders

  • The award of the Mwea Divisional Land Disputes Tribunal Case No. D26D/Vol.IV/145 and the resultant decree of the Senior Resident Magistrate at Wang’uru Arbitration Case No. 13 of 2004 in respect of Land Parcel No. MWERUA/KITHUMBU/1049 are quashed.
  • Costs of the motion are awarded to the ex-parte applicant.