[2021] KEHC 4015 (KLR)
The court found that while the right to bail is constitutionally guaranteed, it is not absolute and may be restricted where there are compelling reasons. In this case, the pre-bail reports for the 1st and 2nd accused persons were considered alongside the prosecution's concerns for the safety of the remaining...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 4015 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Mwenyeheri Mgele Jefa; Defendant: Shadrack Nyiro Rasi; Defendant: Berrnard Masai Mwangeka
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E014 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Review Application
- Outcome
- partial grant of bond application
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond, Pretrial Detention, Witness Protection
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Mwenyeheri Mgele Jefa
Defendant
Shadrack Nyiro Rasi
Defendant
Berrnard Masai Mwangeka
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused persons should be granted bond pending trial in light of the pre-bail reports and witness safety concerns.
- 2 Whether the circumstances have changed since the initial denial of bond to warrant a review of the orders.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the right to bail is constitutionally guaranteed, it is not absolute and may be restricted where there are compelling reasons. In this case, the pre-bail reports for the 1st and 2nd accused persons were considered alongside the prosecution's concerns for the safety of the remaining civilian witnesses. The court determined that the risk to witness safety constituted a compelling reason to delay the release of the 1st and 2nd accused until after the witnesses had testified. However, the 3rd accused's pre-bail report was favourable and there were no specific safety concerns raised, justifying his immediate release on bond. The court thus balanced the rights of the...
Court Disposition
partial grant of bond application
Orders
- The 1st and 2nd accused persons shall be released on a bond of Kshs. 500,000 each with a surety of similar amount after the remaining civilian witnesses testify on 25.11.2021.
- The 3rd accused person may be released on bond of Kshs. 500,000 and a surety of a similar amount immediately.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
CRIMINAL CASE NO. E014 OF 2020
REPUBLIC...................................................................PROSECUTOR
-VS-
MWENYEHERI MGELE JEFA.................................1ST ACCUSED
SHADRACK NYIRO RASI........................................2ND ACCUSED
BERRNARD MASAI MWANGEKA........................3RD ACCUSED
RULING
1. The accused persons herein applied for review of orders made on 16th December 2010 denying them bond. Fresh pre-bail reports were called for and the same were filed on 14. 9.2021.
2. This court has perused the pre-bail reports in respect of the accused persons and in consideration of the fear by the remaining civilian witnesses as to their safety, if the 1st and 2nd accused persons are released before they testify, an order is hereby issued that once the remaining civilian witnesses testify on 25. 11. 2021, the 1st and 2nd accused persons shall be released on a bond of Kshs. 500,000 each with a surety of similar amount.
3. For now they remain in custody at the Shimo la Tewa GK prison.
4. The 3rd Accused person may be released on bond of Kshs. 500,000 and a surety of a similar amount in consideration of the fresh pre-bail report which is favourable.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT/ONLINE THROUGH MS TEAMS, THIS 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJO
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Ben- Court Assistant
Ms. Keya for the State
Mr. Were for the 1st Accused
Mr. Otuoma for the 2nd Accused
Ms. Ayieko for the 3rd Accused
HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJO
JUDGE