[2021] KEHC 7378 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7378 (KLR)

The court found that there is a discrepancy between the amount claimed by the Applicant and the amounts reflected in the decree and Certificate of Order against Government, particularly regarding whether prior payments by the Respondent have been deducted. The Applicant must clarify the correct decretal sum and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7378 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Crown Motors Group Limited; Respondent: Nairobi City County Government
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application E1132 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Directions Prior to Judgment
Outcome
Directions issued for clarification and further pleadings before judgment.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus Orders, Enforcement of Decrees, Government Liability
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Judicial Review Mandamus Orders Enforcement of Decrees Government Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crown Motors Group Limited

Applicant

Nairobi City County Government

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Directions Prior to Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Applicant is entitled to an order of mandamus to compel payment of the decretal sum by the Respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the amount claimed by the Applicant reflects deductions for payments already made by the Respondent.
  3. 3 Whether the costs awarded in the underlying suit have been ascertained.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there is a discrepancy between the amount claimed by the Applicant and the amounts reflected in the decree and Certificate of Order against Government, particularly regarding whether prior payments by the Respondent have been deducted. The Applicant must clarify the correct decretal sum and whether the awarded costs have been ascertained before the court can issue a final judgment on the application for mandamus. The court therefore directed the parties to file amended pleadings and affidavits to address these issues, and scheduled a further mention for directions.

Court Disposition

Directions issued for clarification and further pleadings before judgment.

Orders

  • The Applicant is granted leave to file and serve an Amended Notice of Motion, Amended Statutory Statement, and supplementary affidavit within fourteen days.
  • The Respondent is granted leave to file and serve a supplementary affidavit within fourteen days of service of the Applicant's amended pleadings.