[2013] KEHC 5586 (KLR)
The court found that the Nambale Land Disputes Tribunal exceeded its statutory jurisdiction by making decisions affecting the title, subdivision, and transfer of registered land parcels Bukhayo/Kisoko/3641 and 3647. The Tribunal's powers under section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act were limited and did not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 5586 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Isaac Wafula; Applicant: Dismas Pepela; Respondent: Nambale Land Disputes Tribunal; Interested Party: Resila Auma Kafwa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 3 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Certiorari
- Outcome
- Application granted. Orders of certiorari issued quashing the Tribunal's decision. Costs to the applicants.
- Judges
- SM Kibunja
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Registered Land Act, Certiorari, Quashing Tribunal Decisions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isaac Wafula
Applicant
Dismas Pepela
Applicant
Nambale Land Disputes Tribunal
Respondent
Resila Auma Kafwa
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Certiorari
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Nambale Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine disputes relating to registered land parcels Bukhayo/Kisoko/3641 and 3647.
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's decision to cancel title, subdivide, and transfer registered land exceeded its statutory powers under section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Nambale Land Disputes Tribunal exceeded its statutory jurisdiction by making decisions affecting the title, subdivision, and transfer of registered land parcels Bukhayo/Kisoko/3641 and 3647. The Tribunal's powers under section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act were limited and did not extend to matters of ownership or title of registered land. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision, as adopted by the Principal Magistrate's Court, was ultra vires and liable to be quashed. The application for certiorari was therefore granted, and the Tribunal's decision was set aside.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Orders of certiorari issued quashing the Tribunal's decision. Costs to the applicants.
Orders
- An order of certiorari is issued to quash the decision of the Nambale Land Disputes Tribunal over land parcels Bukhayo/Kisoko/3641 and 3647 made on 2nd August 2007 and adopted by the Principal Magistrate’s Court Busia in land case No.59 of 2007 on 29th January, 2008.
- Costs to be paid by the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUSIA.
Misc. App. No. 3 Of 2008.
IN THE MATTER OF THE REGISTERED LAND ACT.
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLCIATION BY ISAAC WAFULA & DISMAS
PEPELA FOR ORDERS OF CEDRTIORARI
AND
IN THE MATTER OF LR.NOs. BUKHAYO/KISOKO/3641 & 3647 OVER BUSIA PM
LAND CASE NO. 59 OF 2007.
BETWEEN
REPUBLIC ………………………………………………………………………APPLICANT
VERSUS
NAMBALE LAND DISPUTES
TRIBUNAL ……………………………………………………………………RESPONDENT
AND
RESILA AUMA KAFWA …………………………………………….INTERESTED PARTY.
R U L I N G.
ISAAC WAFULA and DISMAS PEPELA, hereinafter referred to 1st and 2nd Applicant, through M/S. Ashioya& company Advocates filed a notice of motion dated 22nd March, 2008 for the following orders:
That an order of certiorari do issue to call to the High court and quash the decision of Nambale Land Disputes Tribunal over Land parcel Bukhayo/Kisoko/3641 and 3647 made on 2nd August 2007 and adopted by the Principal Magistrate’s court Busia in land case No.59 of 1997 on the 29th January, 2008.
That cost be paid by the Respondent.
The application is based on the following grounds;
That Nambale Land Disputes Tribunal dealt with a matter that was beyond their jurisdiction in view of sections 21 and 22 of the Registered Land Act (Now repealed).
That the Tribunal’s decision aimed at counseling the title of the Applicant and sub dividing the same is in excess of theTtribunal’s powers under section 3 of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act. (Now repealed).
The application was served but no replying papers have been filed. The Exparte Applicant’s counsel filed their written submissions dated 9th August, 2012 on the 13th August, 2012. The court has carefully considered the submission by counsel and the pleadings generally and find as follows:
That looking at the copy of the Nambale Land Dispute Tribunal proceedings annexed to the affidavit of Isaac Wafula sworn on 27th February, 2008 it is clear that the claim that had been taken before the Tribunal related to land parcel Bukhayo/Kisoko/3641. The Tribunal after hearing the parties made several decisions as shown here below;
After observing thatDismasPepela occupies portions of Bukhayo/Kisoko/3641 and that his land is parcel Bukhayo/Kisoko/3047 which was a subdivision from Bukhayo/Kisoko/291 ordered that the Land Registrar and the Government Surveyor should determine the measurements and exact position of DismasPepela’s land on the ground.
That Land parcel Bukhayo/Kisoko/3641 be sub divided between Isaac Wafula and ChrispinusKafwa with the former getting 3 hectares and the latter the balance.
That after (a) and (b) above has been complied with, the Government Surveyor to plant the boundaries on the ground.
That DismasPepela to meet all the costs.
That while the heading in the Tribunal proceedings showed that the dispute was over Bukhayo/Kisoko/3641 the decision of the Tribunal involved also land parcel Bukhayo/Kisoko/3647.
That all the parcels of land listed hereinabove are registered and issues to do with their ownership was outside the powers granted to the Tribunal under section 3 (1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act. (now repealed).
That to carry out the decision of the Tribunal, would result to the cancelation of the title, sub division of the said land and transfer of portion thereof to the 3rd parties which is beyond the powers of the Tribunal under section 3 (1) under the Land Disputes Tribunal Act.
The foregoing clearly shows that the decision made by the Nambale Land Disputes Tribunal on 2nd August, 2007 and adopted in Busia PMCC.in land case No. 59 of 2007 in relation to Bukhayo/Kisoko/3641 relating to the cancellation of the title, sub division and transfer to a 3rd party was beyond the powers of the tribunal and the application dated 22nd March, 2008 is hereby granted in terms of prayer 1and 2.
Dated on the 4th day of July, 2013
S. KIBUNJA
JUDGE
BUSIA (K).