[2022] KEHC 13624 (KLR)
The court found that, upon reviewing the record and hearing the witnesses, the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused persons. This finding means that the evidence presented by the prosecution, if uncontroverted, would be sufficient to warrant a conviction. Consequently, the accused...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 13624 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Caled Agani Nangeso; Defendant: Josephat Amam alias Ngwiri
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 37 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Accused persons put on their defence.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Trial Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Caled Agani Nangeso
Defendant
Josephat Amam alias Ngwiri
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant putting them on their defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, upon reviewing the record and hearing the witnesses, the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused persons. This finding means that the evidence presented by the prosecution, if uncontroverted, would be sufficient to warrant a conviction. Consequently, the accused persons are required to be put on their defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court did not make any findings on the credibility of the evidence at this stage, as the threshold is only whether there is a case to answer, not whether the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
Accused persons put on their defence.
Orders
- The accused persons are hereby put on their defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
Republic v Nangeso & another (Criminal Case 37 of 2018) [2022] KEHC 13624 (KLR) (23 September 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 13624 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kakamega
Criminal Case 37 of 2018
WM Musyoka, J
September 23, 2022
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Caled Agani Nangeso
1st Accused
Josephat Amam alias Ngwiri
2nd Accused
Ruling
1. I have gone through the record herein, and I also had the benefit of hearing the witnesses herein.
2. Am persuaded that the Republic has established a prima facie case against the accused persons, and I hereby put them on their defence.
RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022WM MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Erick Zalo, Court Assistant.Ms. Kagai, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the Republic.Mr. Matete, Advocate for the accused person.