[2011] KEHC 1862 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, having called nine witnesses, established a prima facie case against both accused persons for the offence of murder. The evidence presented was sufficient to require the accused to be put on their defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 1862 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Ngenyo Nyangala; Defendant: Boru Nyangala
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 21 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Both accused persons are found to have a case to answer and are ordered to give their defence.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Ngenyo Nyangala
Defendant
Boru Nyangala
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant their being put on their defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence adduced by the prosecution meets the threshold under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, having called nine witnesses, established a prima facie case against both accused persons for the offence of murder. The evidence presented was sufficient to require the accused to be put on their defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court did not make a determination on guilt or innocence at this stage but ruled that the threshold for a prima facie case had been met, necessitating the accused to respond to the charge.
Court Disposition
Both accused persons are found to have a case to answer and are ordered to give their defence.
Orders
- Both accused persons shall give their defence to the charge of murder in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLICOF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 21 OF 2008
REPUBLIC …………….……...........…………….………….. PROSECUTION
=VERSUS=
NGENYO NYANGALA ...................…………...……..….……… 1ST ACCUSED
BORU NYANGALA ………..............…………………………... 2ND ACCUSED
RULING
The two accused persons namely NGENYO NYANGALAandBORU NYANGALA are jointly charged with the offence of MURDER CONTRARY TO SECTION 203 as read with SECTION 204 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE. The prosecution led by the learned State Counsel called a total of nine (9) witnesses in support of their case. I have considered the evidence adduced by these nine (9) witnesses. In my view a prima facie has been established against the two accused. I therefore direct that both accused shall give their defence to this charge in accordance with S. 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Dated and Delivered in Mombasa this 24th day of June 2011.
M ODERO
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Mushelle holding brief for Ms. Kipsang
Mr. Onserio for State