[2021] KEHC 492 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 492 (KLR)

The court found that the accused, Nicholas Kiprotich Bosuben, unlawfully killed the deceased, Denis Mukasa, during a confrontation, as established by the facts and his plea of guilty to manslaughter. The court considered the seriousness of the offence, the maximum sentence prescribed by law, and the mitigating...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 492 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Nicholas Kiprotich Bosuben
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 24 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Plea Bargain, Sentencing Principles, Mitigation, Custodial Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Manslaughter Plea Bargain Sentencing Principles Mitigation Custodial Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Nicholas Kiprotich Bosuben

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the accused is guilty of manslaughter as per the plea bargain agreement.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the offence of manslaughter in the circumstances of this case.
  3. 3 Whether the period spent in custody should be considered in sentencing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the accused, Nicholas Kiprotich Bosuben, unlawfully killed the deceased, Denis Mukasa, during a confrontation, as established by the facts and his plea of guilty to manslaughter. The court considered the seriousness of the offence, the maximum sentence prescribed by law, and the mitigating factors, including the accused's remorse and plea of guilty, which saved judicial time. The court also took into account the period the accused had already spent in custody. Balancing these factors, the court determined that a custodial sentence of five years' imprisonment was appropriate, with the period already served in custody to be deducted from the total sentence. The accused...

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • The accused is sentenced to five years' imprisonment.
  • The period already spent in custody shall be taken into account when computing the sentence.