[2023] KEHC 21777 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution did not present any compelling reasons to deny the accused bail as required by Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution. The pre-bail report was favorable, indicating community and family support, and the victim's family was not opposed to bail. The court emphasized that the primary...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 21777 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Michael Wainaina Njeri
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 32 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Bail granted to the accused pending trial.
- Judges
- PM Mulwa
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Compelling Reasons, Right to Bail, Murder Charge
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Michael Wainaina Njeri
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bail as required by Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution did not present any compelling reasons to deny the accused bail as required by Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution. The pre-bail report was favorable, indicating community and family support, and the victim's family was not opposed to bail. The court emphasized that the primary consideration is the accused's attendance at trial, and in the absence of evidence suggesting the accused is a flight risk or would interfere with witnesses, bail should not be denied. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to grant bail to the accused pending trial.
Court Disposition
Bail granted to the accused pending trial.
Orders
- The accused may be released on a bond of Kshs 500,000 with one surety of a similar amount.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Republic v Njeri (Criminal Case 32 of 2019) [2023] KEHC 21777 (KLR) (30 August 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 21777 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kiambu
Criminal Case 32 of 2019
PM Mulwa, J
August 30, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Michael Wainaina Njeri
Accused
Ruling
1. The accused herein Michael Wainaina Njeri is charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars are that on July 28, 2019 at Dagoretti Market in Kikuyu Sub-County within Kiambu County murdered Kamau Njambi.
2. On May 23, 2023, the accused denied the charge and a plea of not guilty was entered.
3. On the basis of two bail applications filed, counsel for the accused pleads with the court to release the accused person on lenient bond terms, contending he is not a flight risk and that he undertakes to comply with any conditions set by the court.
4. The state is not opposed to the release of the accused on bond but urged the court to call for a pre-bail report.
5. The pre-bail report was filed on July 27, 2023. The community and colleagues around Dagoretti slaughterhouse remember the accused and the deceased, who were great friends, as very hard-working employees. Both used to abuse alcohol but were not known law breakers and the alleged incident shocked the local residents. The accused lost both parents at a young age but his extended family members, who were interviewed, were supportive and promised to ensure he complies with the set bond terms in the event he is released.
6. The pre-bail report stated the accused person has studied up to class 7 due to financial challenges and has not undertaken any technical or vocational skills.
7. The victim’s family, though hurt, had since forgiven the accused and were not opposed to his release on bond on any terms.
8. Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution guarantees an arrested person the right to be released on bond/bail on reasonable conditions, pending a charge or trial, unless there are compelling reasons not to be released.
9. This court in exercising its mandate to either grant or deny bail pending trial is guided by the Judiciary Bail and Bond Policy Guidelines which recognize that an accused person should be released on bond pending trial unless there are compelling reasons. The prosecution is vested with the duty to bring to the attention of the court any compelling reasons that would warrant the denial of bond/bail pending trial.
10. The key consideration by the court in deciding whether to grant or deny bail is the accused attendance in court during the trial. In the instant case, the prosecution has not raised any compelling reasons that would warrant the court to deny the accused bail.
11. In the absence of any compelling reasons, this court will exercise its discretion and allow the application for bail/bond pending trial.
12. In the premises therefore, the accused may be released on a bond of Kshs 500,000 with one surety of a similar amount.It is so ordered.
RULING DELIVERED VIRTUALLY, DATED AND SIGNED AT KIAMBU THIS 30TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023. ........................................P.M. MULWAJUDGEIn the presence of:Duale – court assistantMr. Muriuki - for the stateMr. Munene h/b for Mr. Gachau - for the accused personAccused – present in court