[2023] KEHC 723 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 723 (KLR)

The court found that although bail is a constitutional right, it may be denied if compelling reasons exist. The prosecution and the victim's family demonstrated through affidavit evidence that the accused had no fixed abode and was therefore a flight risk. The accused failed to demonstrate to the court that he had a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 723 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Stephen Macharia Njeri Alias Gachari Alias Alex; Respondent: Gerald Gachugu Gichuhi (deceased, represented by Ruth Nduguti Gichuhi)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case E015 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application
Outcome
application for bond declined; accused to remain in custody during trial
Judges
RB Ngetich
Legal Topics
Bail and Bond, Flight Risk, Compelling Reasons, Pre Bail Report
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail and Bond Flight Risk Compelling Reasons Pre Bail Report

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Stephen Macharia Njeri Alias Gachari Alias Alex

Defendant

Gerald Gachugu Gichuhi (deceased, represented by Ruth Nduguti Gichuhi)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application

  1. 1 Whether the accused should be granted bail or bond pending trial for the offence of murder.
  2. 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bail as required by Article 49(h) of the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although bail is a constitutional right, it may be denied if compelling reasons exist. The prosecution and the victim's family demonstrated through affidavit evidence that the accused had no fixed abode and was therefore a flight risk. The accused failed to demonstrate to the court that he had a fixed place of abode. The court concluded that, given the lack of a fixed residence, there was a high likelihood that the accused would be difficult to trace if he absconded. Consequently, the application for bond was declined and the accused was ordered to remain in custody during the trial.

Court Disposition

application for bond declined; accused to remain in custody during trial

Orders

  • Application for bond is hereby declined.
  • The accused is to remain in custody during the trial.