[2022] KEHC 15347 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 15347 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was never released on bond during the pendency of his trial and, therefore, is entitled to have the period spent in remand custody credited towards his sentence. The court applied Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates that any period spent in custody prior...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 15347 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Tom Mboya Njiri; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E120 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Factoring Remand Period Into Sentence
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
A. Ong’injo
Legal Topics
Sentencing Principles, Remand Period Credit, Narcotic Offences, Application of Section 333 2 Cpc
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Principles Remand Period Credit Narcotic Offences Application of Section 333 2 Cpc

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tom Mboya Njiri

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Factoring Remand Period Into Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the period the applicant spent in remand custody prior to conviction should be considered in computing his sentence.
  2. 2 Whether Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code applies to the applicant's circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was never released on bond during the pendency of his trial and, therefore, is entitled to have the period spent in remand custody credited towards his sentence. The court applied Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates that any period spent in custody prior to conviction must be taken into account in sentencing. The court distinguished the present application from the applicant's previous unsuccessful resentencing petition, noting that the current application was properly grounded in law. Consequently, the court ordered that the applicant's 10-year sentence should be deemed to have commenced on 21st April 2016, the date he was...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant's sentence of 10 years shall run from 21st April 2016.