[2023] KEHC 21799 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, particularly the identification of the accused at the scene, the accused's communication of intent to kill, and the discovery of his wallet at the scene, established a prima facie case. Applying the principles from Bhatt v Republic and Festo Wandera Mukando v The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 21799 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Paul Njoroge Njuguna
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 4 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case
- Outcome
- Accused put on his defence; prosecution established a prima facie case.
- Judges
- J Wakiaga
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Criminal Procedure, Identification Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Paul Njoroge Njuguna
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence on record, if unchallenged, would justify a conviction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, particularly the identification of the accused at the scene, the accused's communication of intent to kill, and the discovery of his wallet at the scene, established a prima facie case. Applying the principles from Bhatt v Republic and Festo Wandera Mukando v The Republic, the court held that it was satisfied the accused should be put on his defence under section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court refrained from detailed analysis at this stage, as required by precedent, and ordered the accused to choose his mode of defence.
Court Disposition
Accused put on his defence; prosecution established a prima facie case.
Orders
- The accused is put on his defence under section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- The accused is called upon to choose how he intends to defend himself.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Republic v Njuguna (Criminal Case 4 of 2019) [2023] KEHC 21799 (KLR) (30 August 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 21799 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Murang'a
Criminal Case 4 of 2019
J Wakiaga, J
August 30, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Paul Njoroge Njuguna
Accused
Ruling
1. The accused was charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 204 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of which were that on the April 6, 2019, at Ndutumi sub-location in Kahuro sub-county within Muranga county murdered Collins Waweru Njambi.
2. He pleaded not guilty to the said charges and to prove its case, the prosecution called and examined five witnesses at the close of which submissions were made by the prosecution to the effect that PW2 saw the accused at the scene and grabbed a panga from him and that the accused had called PW3 and informed her that he was planning to kill the deceased and that PW5 found the wallet containing the accused documents at the scene thereby proving prima facie case.
3. At this stage of the proceeding, all that the court is required to do, is to establish whether based on the evidence of record, it will be willing to convict the accused should he opt not to offer any evidence on his defence as was stated in the case of Bhatt v Republic[1957] E A.
4. The court is not at this stage of the proceeding required to make a detailed analysis of the evidence tendered unless the verdict of no case to answer is to be entered as was stated in Festo Wandera Mukando v The Republic [1980] KLR 103 where the court stated that it can prove embarrassing to the court and in extreme cases may require an appellate court to set aside an otherwise sound judgement, so where no case is rejected the court should say no more than that its.
5. With that injunction in mind, I have looked at the evidence tendered before the court and in particular the identification of the accused at the scene and I am satisfied and hold that the prosecution has established a prime facie case to enable me put the accused on his defence under the provision of section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code which I hereby do.
6. The accused through his advocate is now called upon to choose how he intend to defend himself and it is ordered.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MURANGA THIS 30th DAY OF AUGUST 2023J. WAKIAGAJUDGEIn the presence of:Ms Gakumu for StateMr Nandwa for Mr. Mbugua for the AccusedSusan – Court Assistant