https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/11024

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/11024

The court treated the original sentencing remark as intended to mean that the custodial period already served must be factored into the sentence, and therefore reviewed the sentence to account for time spent in custody.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 11024 (KLR)
Parties
Prosecutor: Republic; Accused: Evans Morube Nyabuto
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E051 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review/ruling
Outcome
Sentence reviewed
Judges
["PK Rotich"]
Legal Topics
Review of Sentence, Time Spent in Custody, Correction/interpretation of Sentencing Order
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Review of Sentence Time Spent in Custody Correction/interpretation of Sentencing Order

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Prosecutor

Evans Morube Nyabuto

Accused

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review/ruling

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed in the murder conviction should be reviewed to expressly account for time spent in custody.
  2. 2 Whether the court should correct the wording 'taken into' to mean 'taken into account'.

Ratio Decidendi

The court treated the original sentencing remark as intended to mean that the custodial period already served must be factored into the sentence, and therefore reviewed the sentence to account for time spent in custody.

Court Disposition

Sentence reviewed

Orders

  • The sentence of Evans Morube Nyabuto and Abel Orenge is reviewed to take into account the time they spent in custody.