[2024] KEHC 6714 (KLR)
The High Court is unable to determine the appeal due to the absence of the original trial court records and the record of appeal. The confusion regarding the case numbers and the lack of linkage between the available files further compounds the problem. The court finds that without the full record of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 6714 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Republic; Respondent: Samuel Nyaga
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E004 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Appeal—directions for Record of Appeal and Trial Court File Retrieval
- Outcome
- Directions issued for appellant to file records of appeal and for retrieval of original trial court records; matter to be mentioned for compliance and further directions.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Record Management, No Case to Answer, Trial Procedure Irregularities
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Appellant
Samuel Nyaga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Appeal—directions for Record of Appeal and Trial Court File Retrieval
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court can determine the appeal in the absence of the original trial court record and record of appeal.
- 2 Whether the confusion regarding the case numbers and missing records precludes a fair appellate determination.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court is unable to determine the appeal due to the absence of the original trial court records and the record of appeal. The confusion regarding the case numbers and the lack of linkage between the available files further compounds the problem. The court finds that without the full record of the proceedings, particularly the testimonies of prosecution witnesses, there is no basis upon which to adjudicate the appeal. The court acknowledges systemic issues in the registry that have led to the unavailability of files, affecting both civil and criminal appeals. As a result, the court directs the appellant to file the necessary records of appeal and instructs the Deputy Registrar to...
Court Disposition
Directions issued for appellant to file records of appeal and for retrieval of original trial court records; matter to be mentioned for compliance and further directions.
Orders
- The appellant is directed to file records of appeal in respect of the relevant matters.
- The Deputy Registrar shall call for the relevant original trial court records once more.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Republic v Nyaga (Criminal Appeal E004 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 6714 (KLR) (7 June 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 6714 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Busia
Criminal Appeal E004 of 2023
WM Musyoka, J
June 7, 2024
Between
Republic
Appellant
and
Samuel Nyaga
Respondent
(Appeal from conviction and sentence by Hon. P. Olengo, Senior Principal Magistrate, SPM, in Busia CMCCRC No. 1265 of 2021, of 3rd May 2021)
Ruling
1. Samuel Nyaga, to be referred to hereafter as the respondent, had been charged before the primary court, in Busia CMCCRC No. E1266 of 2021, on 5 counts of different offences under the Crops Act, Cap 318, Laws of Kenya, and the East African Community Custom Management Act, 2004, relating to failure to register as a dealer, transporting a scheduled crop from a non-registered dealer, importing a maize consignment through a non-designated point, being in possession of uncustomed goods, and ferrying restricted goods. There is a ruling on a no case to answer, but there is no record of the proceedings, and I cannot tell from the ruling, how many witnesses testified against him, and what the purport of their testimonies was.
2. This matter is all jumbled up. The criminal case, in which the respondent herein was tried, was Busia CMCCRC No. E1266 of 2021. The trial court record for Busia CMCCRC No. E1266 of 2021 has been availed, the accused person in that file was the respondent herein. However, that trial court record does not have any proceedings, all it carries is a photostat copy of the handwritten and a typed copy of the ruling delivered on 3rd May 2021 in Busia CMCCRC No. E1266 of 2021. However, the appeal herein, going by the petition of appeal filed herein, which is undated, but was filed herein on 10th January 2020, is in respect of proceedings in Busia CMCCRC No. 1265 of 2021. The original trial court records in respect of Busia CMCCRC No. 1265 of 2021 have not been availed, and therefore, I cannot tell who the accused person in that matter was.
3. The appellant has not filed a record of appeal, with respect to the proceedings in either Busia CMCCRC No. 1265 of 2021, or Busia CMCCRC No. E1266 of 2021. I do not, therefore, have the benefit of reading through the proceedings that led up to the impugned ruling of 3rd May 2021. What are purported to be the proceedings, in Busia CMCCRC No. E1266 of 2021, is a one-page document, displaying the proceedings that were conducted on 16th April 2021 and 19th April 2021. 16th April 2021 was when the respondent took plea. The record of 19th April 2021 is not complete, for it only has the Coram. After that there is the ruling of 3rd May 2021. So, how do I determine this appeal without sight of the proceedings taken, which culminated in that ruling?
4. I see an original trial court record placed inside this appeal file. It is in respect of Busia CMCCRC No. 1217 of 2021. The accused person was Paul Muriithi Kinyua. There are typed proceedings in there. 6 witnesses were presented, and testified, and a ruling on a no case to answer was delivered on 30th April 2021, where the court found that no prima facie case had been established, and the accused person, in that case, was acquitted. That case had been consolidated with another, Busia CMCCRC No. 1188 of 2021, by an order made on 27th April 2021. The accused person, in Busia CMCCRC No. 1188 of 2021, was Harir Suezi. I have perused the proceedings in Busia CMCCRC No. 1217 of 2021, and they were limited to the accused person in that case.
5. I have been unable to see any link between the proceedings in Busia CMCCRC No. 1217 of 2021, and those in Busia CMCCRC No. 1265 of 2021, mentioned in the petition of appeal; and Busia CMCCRC No. E1266 of 2021, where the respondent herein was the accused person. Yet, the only available full record of the proceedings, where witnesses were recorded as they testified, is in Busia CMCCRC No. 1217 of 2021. I have no full record of the proceedings in Busia CMCCRC No. E1266 of 2021, where the respondent herein was the accused, nor in Busia CMCCRC No. 1265 of 2021, referred to in the petition of appeal. Without that full record, of the testimonies of the witnesses presented by the prosecution, there would be no basis upon which I can determine this appeal.
6. My inclination was initially to dismiss the appeal herein, because of the mess that I have highlighted above. However, I realised that the appellant may not be to blame. I have noted that most appeals at the High Court at Busia, be they civil or criminal, are stuck for absence of the original trial court records and records of appeal. I do not know what is happening at the court registries at the Chief Magistrate’s Court. Files appear to disappear completely once matters are concluded there, so that once appeals are filed against the determinations there, the relevant files become completely unavailable. There are criminal appeals here filed as far back as 2021, in respect of which directions have never been taken, because the original trial court records are unavailable, and so the appellants cannot generate and file records of appeal. The Deputy Registrar and I have to mention these matters countless times, to no avail, wasting a lot of judicial time in the process.
7. As a way forward, I direct the appellant to file records of appeal in respect of the relevant matters that I have mentioned above. The Deputy Registrar shall call for the relevant original trial court records, once more; and shall cause a certified copy of this ruling to be furnished to the Chief Magistrate. The matter shall be mentioned for compliance and further directions. Orders accordingly.
RULING IS DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT, AT BUSIA, THIS 7THDAY OF JUNE 2024W MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant.AdvocatesMs. Chepkonga, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the appellant.