https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/9225

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/9225

The court found a clear pattern of repeated non-attendance by the 1st and 2nd accused and their counsel, which had stalled a trial pending since 2022 and prejudiced justice. On that basis, the warrant against the 2nd accused could properly have led to bond cancellation, but the court exercised discretion to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 9225 (KLR)
Parties
Prosecution: Republic; 1st Accused: Patrick Muriuki Nyaga alias Karis Baite; 2nd Accused: Brenda Gatwiri Kinoti; 3rd Accused: Josphat Sankale
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case E009 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Oral Application to Lift Warrant of Arrest and Reinstate Bond
Outcome
Partly allowed
Judges
["K Kimondo"]
Legal Topics
Bail and Bond, Warrant of Arrest, Bond Reinstatement, Non Attendance of Court, Case Management, Witness Fatigue
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Bail and Bond Warrant of Arrest Bond Reinstatement Non Attendance of Court Case Management Witness Fatigue

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Prosecution

Patrick Muriuki Nyaga alias Karis Baite

1st Accused

Brenda Gatwiri Kinoti

2nd Accused

Josphat Sankale

3rd Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Oral Application to Lift Warrant of Arrest and Reinstate Bond

  1. 1 Whether the warrant of arrest issued against the 1st accused should be lifted.
  2. 2 Whether the warrant of arrest issued against the 2nd accused should be lifted and her bond reinstated.
  3. 3 Whether the 2nd accused's repeated failure to attend court justified cancellation of bond.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found a clear pattern of repeated non-attendance by the 1st and 2nd accused and their counsel, which had stalled a trial pending since 2022 and prejudiced justice. On that basis, the warrant against the 2nd accused could properly have led to bond cancellation, but the court exercised discretion to reinstate the bond with the existing surety, lift the warrant, and impose a new attendance condition. The warrant against the 1st accused was lifted because he was in custody in another case.

Court Disposition

Partly allowed

Orders

  • Warrant of arrest issued on 15 June 2026 against the 1st accused is lifted.
  • Warrant of arrest issued on 15 June 2026 against the 2nd accused is lifted.