[2023] KEHC 1343 (KLR)
The court found that none of the three prosecution witnesses connected the accused to the death of the deceased. There was no evidence placing the accused at the scene of the crime or establishing any relationship between her and the deceased prior to the incident. The prosecution failed to adduce any evidence...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 1343 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Eunice Nyambura Alias Waithera
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 54 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether Accused Has a Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case
- Outcome
- acquittal
- Judges
- RB Ngetich
- Legal Topics
- Murder Charge, Prima Facie Case, Acquittal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Eunice Nyambura Alias Waithera
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether Accused Has a Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant her being placed on her defence.
- 2 Whether there was any evidence linking the accused to the death of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that none of the three prosecution witnesses connected the accused to the death of the deceased. There was no evidence placing the accused at the scene of the crime or establishing any relationship between her and the deceased prior to the incident. The prosecution failed to adduce any evidence linking the accused to the offence. Consequently, the court held that no prima facie case had been established to warrant placing the accused on her defence. The accused was therefore acquitted under section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
acquittal
Orders
- The accused is acquitted under section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- The accused is to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
Republic v Nyambura (Criminal Case 54 of 2018) [2023] KEHC 1343 (KLR) (27 February 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 1343 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kiambu
Criminal Case 54 of 2018
RB Ngetich, J
February 27, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Eunice Nyambura Alias Waithera
Accused
Ruling
1. The accused herein Eunice Nyambura Alias Waithera was charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. Particulars are that on the night of 28th day of November 2018 at Kamae village in Kahawa West within Kiambu County, the accused murdered Francis Kamau.
3. On December 13, 2018, the charge and its full particulars were read over and explained to the accused. He pleaded not guilty to the charge and a plea of not guilty was entered.
4. On 4/7/2019, the prosecution availed two witnesses. PW1 Benson Shatuka testified that on November 27, 2018 at 9. 00p.m, he was making supper in his room when he heard commotion. He stepped out of his house and found the deceased Francis Kamau lying down behind his house, bleeding from the chest. He called for a vehicle to take him to hospital. He took him to Kahawa West Hospital where he was referred to Kiambu Level 4 Hospital. On arrival at Kiambu Level 4 Hospital, the deceased Francis Kamau was pronounced dead. He said the deceased had been his neighbour for two weeks.
5. On cross examination, PW1 said he did not find the accused at the spot the deceased was lying.
6. PW2, Samuel Gituku Kimaru testified that the deceased was his nephew. He said he received report from his mother that the deceased had been stabbed and was at Kiambu Hospital. He identified the body for postmorterm.
7. The 3rd witness IP Rashid Adan testified on 4/10/2022. He testified that he arrested the accused and booked her at Kiamumbi Police Station. On cross examination, he said he played the role of arresting officer and that he arrested the accused on November 27, 2018.
8. No other witness was availed to court by the prosecution to adduce evidence despite several adjournments. Having been granted a last adjournment, the court declined to allow another adjournment on 4/10/2022.
9. On 5/10/2022, the state opted to enter a nolle proseque. The defence counsel objected to nolle proseque being entered. By ruling delivered on 23/2/2023, this court declined to permit entry of nolle proseque. The prosecution opted to close their case.
10. From the evidence adduced by the 3 (three) prosecution witnesses, none of them connected the accused to the death of the deceased herein Francis Kamau.
11. No evidence was adduced as to the relationship between accused and deceased prior to deceased’s death. There is also no evidence placing the accused at the scene of the incident herein. PW1 who testified as a neighbour of the deceased said when he went outside behind his house after hearing commotion, he found the deceased lying down. He further said he did not see accused at the scene.
12. There is no other evidence connecting/linking accused to the offence.
13. From the foregoing, I find that no primafacie case had been established to warrant accused be placed on her defence.
Final Orders: - 14. I hereby acquit accused under section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
15. Accused to be set at liberty unless lawfully held.
16. Right of appeal within fourteen (14) days.
RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED VIRTUALLY AT KIAMBU THIS 27THDAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023RACHEL NGETICHJUDGEIn the presence of:Martin – Court AssistantMs. Kibebo for AccusedMs. Ngesa for StateAccused – Present