[2024] KEHC 8183 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 8183 (KLR)

The court held that, based on the evidence adduced by the prosecution, including eyewitness testimony, forensic and circumstantial evidence, and the accused's conduct, there was sufficient evidence on each element of the offence of murder to establish a prima facie case against the accused. The court emphasized that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 8183 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Jackson Odhiambo alias Lizer
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case E002 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case
Outcome
Accused found to have a case to answer and ordered to enter defence.
Judges
RN Nyakundi
Legal Topics
Murder, Burden of Proof, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Evidence Evaluation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Burden of Proof Prima Facie Case Criminal Procedure Evidence Evaluation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Jackson Odhiambo alias Lizer

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant him being put on his defence.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence adduced by the prosecution, if believed, could lawfully sustain a conviction for the offence of murder.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, based on the evidence adduced by the prosecution, including eyewitness testimony, forensic and circumstantial evidence, and the accused's conduct, there was sufficient evidence on each element of the offence of murder to establish a prima facie case against the accused. The court emphasized that at this stage, it is not required to evaluate the credibility or weight of the evidence, but only to determine whether the evidence, if believed, could sustain a conviction. The court found that the prosecution had discharged its burden to the extent required by law at this stage, and accordingly, the accused was required to enter his defence.

Court Disposition

Accused found to have a case to answer and ordered to enter defence.

Orders

  • The accused is found to have a case to answer under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  • The accused is required to enter his defence.