[2024] KEHC 8217 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 8217 (KLR)

The court found that there was no evidence before it to establish whether any samples were taken from the accused or on whose order. As such, the objection to the production of the Government Chemist report was premature. The court agreed with the prosecution that the application was not ripe for determination and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 8217 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: John Otieno Odindo Alias Johana Otieno Odindo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 12 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Objection to Admissibility of Evidence
Outcome
Objection dismissed; case to proceed to hearing.
Judges
MS Shariff
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Evidence, Dna Sampling, Police Powers, Consent in Criminal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Admissibility of Evidence Dna Sampling Police Powers Consent in Criminal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

John Otieno Odindo Alias Johana Otieno Odindo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Objection to Admissibility of Evidence

  1. 1 Whether blood samples were obtained from the accused without his consent contrary to Section 122(c) of the Penal Code.
  2. 2 Whether DNA sampling was ordered by a competent officer as required under Section 122A of the Penal Code.
  3. 3 Whether the objection to the production of the Government Chemist report was prematurely made.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no evidence before it to establish whether any samples were taken from the accused or on whose order. As such, the objection to the production of the Government Chemist report was premature. The court agreed with the prosecution that the application was not ripe for determination and dismissed the objection, allowing the case to proceed to hearing.

Court Disposition

Objection dismissed; case to proceed to hearing.

Orders

  • The objection to the production of the Government Chemist report is dismissed.
  • The case shall proceed for hearing on 4th July, 2024.