[2022] KEHC 15802 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. The evidence presented did not directly link the accused to the death of the deceased, and key witnesses who might have provided relevant information were not called to testify. The testimonies...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 15802 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Brightone Okoth Oluoch
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 21 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer
- Outcome
- acquittal
- Judges
- KW Kiarie
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Acquittal, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Brightone Okoth Oluoch
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether the evidence on record could sustain a conviction if the accused opted to remain silent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. The evidence presented did not directly link the accused to the death of the deceased, and key witnesses who might have provided relevant information were not called to testify. The testimonies of those who did testify did not disclose the identity of the assailant, and any evidence from absent witnesses would have been inadmissible hearsay. In light of the constitutional right of the accused to remain silent, the court held that it could not convict on the evidence presented. Consequently, the accused was acquitted under section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
acquittal
Orders
- The accused, Brightone Okoth Oluoch, is acquitted of the offence of murder under section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- The accused is to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Republic v Oluoch (Criminal Case 21 of 2020) [2022] KEHC 15802 (KLR) (30 November 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 15802 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Homa Bay
Criminal Case 21 of 2020
KW Kiarie, J
November 30, 2022
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Brightone Okoth Oluoch
Accused
Ruling
1. Brightone Okoth Oluoch is charged with an offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. The particulars of the offence are that on the 24th day of March, 2020, at Nyang’nyiela Trading Centre, Kochich Sub location, in Rachuonyo South Sub County of Homa Bay County, murdered Edwin Omondi Odiembo.
3. Prior to his death, the deceased herein was working at Nyang’nyiela sub county hospital. He was beaten on 24th March 2020 and on 31st March 2020.
4. On 24th March 2020 he went to the hospital where he was working with an injury. He attributed it to an accident. This is what Hesbon Omondi Abonyo (PW3) testified to. A day after the incident he informed PW3 that the injury was as a result of an assault.
5. Emmanuel Okinyi Osano (PW2) another colleague of the deceased testified that the deceased sought treatment at the facility on 31st March 2020 at about 3. 20 p.m. He gave a history of assault by unknown person.
6. There was no disclosure to these two colleagues the identity of the culprit.
7. When corporal Mark Lipale (PW4) testified that the accused and the deceased fought over a girlfriend, one is left wondering where he got this information from. Two witnesses who were not called to testify namely Perez Adoyo and Tom Oluoch recorded in their statements that they were told the cause of the fight but even they, did not indicate that the accused was involved.
8. Had the prosecution called these two witnesses, their evidence would have amounted to inadmissible hearsay.
9. In the Black’s Law Dictionary, 10th Edition prima facie case is defined as follows:Prima facie case. (1805) I. The establishment of a legally required rebuttable presumption. 2. A party's production of enough evidence to allow the fact-trier to infer the fact at issue and rule in the party's favor.
10. The Court of appeal in the case of Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt v. R [1957] E.A 332 at 334 and 335, defined prima facie case as follows:It may not be easy to define what is meant by a “prima facie case”, but at least it must mean one on which a reasonable tribunal, properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence could convict if no explanation is offered by the defence.
11. Article 50 (2) (i) of the Constitution of Kenya provides:(2)Every accused person has the right to a fair trial, which includes the right—(i)to remain silent, and not to testify during the proceedings;In the instant case, if the accused opts to exercise his constitutional right hereinabove stated, I cannot convict him based on the evidence on record. This therefore means that the prosecution has not established a prima facie case against him. I accordingly acquit him of the offence of murder under section 306 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Each is set at liberty unless if otherwise lawfully held.
DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT HOMA BAY THIS 30THDAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022KIARIE WAWERU KIARIEJUDGE