[2022] KEHC 10342 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution's evidence on record was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against both accused persons for the offence of murder. Consequently, the court ruled that both accused persons have a case to answer and must be put on their defence in accordance with section 211 of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 10342 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Alex Gori Ondiek; Defendant: Kennedy Mwinzila Mulyunga
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Makueni
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 16 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Both accused persons found to have a case to answer and put on their defence.
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Case to Answer
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Alex Gori Ondiek
Defendant
Kennedy Mwinzila Mulyunga
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether the accused persons should be put on their defence under section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution's evidence on record was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against both accused persons for the offence of murder. Consequently, the court ruled that both accused persons have a case to answer and must be put on their defence in accordance with section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judge explained the three options available to the accused in making their defence, as required by law.
Court Disposition
Both accused persons found to have a case to answer and put on their defence.
Orders
- Both accused persons are found to have a case to answer.
- Both accused persons are put on their defence and the three options under section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code are explained to them.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
Republic v Ondiek & another (Criminal Case 16 of 2017) [2022] KEHC 10342 (KLR) (19 May 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 10342 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Makueni
Criminal Case 16 of 2017
GMA Dulu, J
May 19, 2022
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Alex Gori Ondiek
1st Accused
Kennedy Mwinzila Mulyunga
2nd Accused
Ruling
1. In this case where the two accused persons stand charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code, having considered the prosecution evidence on record, I come to the conclusion that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against both accused persons.
2. I thus find that the two accused persons herein have a case to answer and put them to their defence and proceed to explain to each of them the three options available in their defence under section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code(Cap. 175).
DELIVERED, SIGNED & DATED THIS 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2022, IN OPEN COURT AT MAKUENI.…………………George DuluJudge