[2023] KEHC 17980 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused persons. Applying the test under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and relevant case law, the judge determined that a reasonable tribunal could convict on the evidence presented if the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 17980 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Shadrack Akumbi Opati; Defendant: Jane Abuli Aroya alias Dorcas; Defendant: Elphas Ochieng Okaalo alias Babu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 18 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether Accused Have a Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused persons put on their defence.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Case to Answer, Prima Facie Evidence, Criminal Trial Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Shadrack Akumbi Opati
Defendant
Jane Abuli Aroya alias Dorcas
Defendant
Elphas Ochieng Okaalo alias Babu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether Accused Have a Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant them being put on their defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused persons. Applying the test under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and relevant case law, the judge determined that a reasonable tribunal could convict on the evidence presented if the accused persons remained silent. Consequently, the accused persons were put on their defence, and the matter was set for defence hearing before the judge's successors at Kakamega.
Court Disposition
Accused persons put on their defence.
Orders
- The accused persons are put on their defence.
- The defence hearing shall be conducted by the judge's successors at Kakamega.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Republic v Opati & 2 others (Criminal Case 18 of 2018) [2023] KEHC 17980 (KLR) (2 June 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 17980 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kakamega
Criminal Case 18 of 2018
WM Musyoka, J
June 2, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Shadrack Akumbi Opati
1st Accused
Jane Abuli Aroya alias Dorcas
2nd Accused
Elphas Ochieng Okaalo alias Babu
3rd Accused
Ruling
1. I have perused the record, and I am persuaded that the Republic has adduced sufficient evidence, to warrant the accused persons being put on their defence, and I hereby put them on their defence. Let the defence hearing be done by my successors at Kakamega.
RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 2ND DAY OF JUNE 2023. WM MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Erick Zalo, Court Assistant.AppearancesMs. Kagai, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the Republic.Mr. Otsyeno, Advocate for the accused person.