[2024] KEHC 8076 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 8076 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant/advocate had obtained a certificate of taxation for Kshs. 883,866.30, which had not been challenged, set aside, or altered by the respondents. In accordance with Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and the cited case law, the court held that it was proper to adopt the certificate of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 8076 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Nicholas Ouma Ounda; Respondent: Matilda Achieng Aiyera; Respondent: Richard Omuma Ouguindi; Respondent: Dennis Okidi; Respondent: Maurice Otieno; Applicant: Brian Njau & Co. Advocates
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E021 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Taxation as Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant/advocate for the taxed sum with interest and costs.
Judges
JM Chigiti
Legal Topics
Advocate Remuneration, Certificate of Taxation, Entry of Judgment, Execution of Costs, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Advocate Remuneration Certificate of Taxation Entry of Judgment Execution of Costs Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Nicholas Ouma Ounda

Respondent

Matilda Achieng Aiyera

Respondent

Richard Omuma Ouguindi

Respondent

Dennis Okidi

Respondent

Maurice Otieno

Respondent

Brian Njau & Co. Advocates

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Taxation as Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of taxation should be adopted as judgment in favour of the advocate.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest on the taxed amount as per the Advocates (Remuneration) Order.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to execute against the respondents for the taxed costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant/advocate had obtained a certificate of taxation for Kshs. 883,866.30, which had not been challenged, set aside, or altered by the respondents. In accordance with Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and the cited case law, the court held that it was proper to adopt the certificate of taxation as judgment without the need for a separate suit for recovery. The court further held that the applicant was entitled to interest at 14% per annum on the taxed amount, calculable after thirty days from service of the bill of costs, as provided under Paragraph 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order. Since the application was unopposed and the respondents had failed to...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant/advocate for the taxed sum with interest and costs.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the applicant/advocate against the respondents/clients for Kshs. 883,866.30 in line with the certificate of taxation dated 8th November 2023, with interest at 14% per annum calculable after thirty days from service of the bill of costs being 14th March 2023, until payment in full.
  • The applicant is at liberty to execute the judgment against the respondents/clients.