[2019] KEHC 83 (KLR)
The court found that although the accused was a student and a first offender, and the Pre-Sentence Report recommended a non-custodial sentence to allow him to complete his education, the lack of reconciliation between the accused's and the deceased's families made it unsafe to release the accused into the community....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 83 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Defendant: Pascal Bokobora Nyahore
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Migori
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 15 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing
- Outcome
- accused sentenced to five years' imprisonment for manslaughter
- Judges
- AC Mrima
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing Principles, Mitigation, Pre Sentence Report
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Pascal Bokobora Nyahore
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be sentenced to a custodial or non-custodial sentence given the circumstances of the offence and the recommendations of the Pre-Sentence Report.
- 2 What weight should be given to the accused's status as a student and first offender in sentencing for manslaughter.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the accused was a student and a first offender, and the Pre-Sentence Report recommended a non-custodial sentence to allow him to complete his education, the lack of reconciliation between the accused's and the deceased's families made it unsafe to release the accused into the community. The court held that, in the absence of reconciliation and given the risk to the accused's safety, a custodial sentence was necessary. The court sentenced the accused to five years' imprisonment, with the option to apply for review of the sentence upon successful reconciliation efforts.
Court Disposition
accused sentenced to five years' imprisonment for manslaughter
Orders
- The accused person is sentenced to five years' imprisonment.
- The accused may apply for review of the sentence once reconciliation is undertaken.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MIGORI
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 15 OF 2018
REPUBLIC ...................................PROSECUTOR
-VERSUS-
PASCAL BOKOBORA NYAHORE......ACCUSED
SENTENCE
1. The Accused person herein was formally charged with the information of murder and after a trial he was found guilty and convicted of the offence of manslaughter on 16/05/2019. On 29/05/2019 parties tendered submissions and mitigations on sentence where the Defence Counsel relied on the Pre-Sentence Report and urged this Court to consider the fact that the accused person is still a student and a first offender so that his education is not interrupted.
2. The prosecution urged the Court to note that an innocent life was lost and although the accused person is a first offender he is liable to life imprisonment.
3. I have considered this matter carefully. The circumstances under which the accused person committed the offence were well captured in the judgment. As stated therein the accused person in the company of another who is still at large confronted the deceased who was in company of his friend at the home of the deceased and fatally wounded him. I agree with the proposal in the Pre-Sentence Report that the accused person may have been out to relieve the deceased of his properties instead. However, that was taken care of in the judgment. I have also taken into account the Pre-Sentence Report on record and its recommendation that the accused person is suitable for a non-custodial sentence so as to accord him an opportunity to complete his tertiary education. The Report also noted that the family of the deeased is yet to come to terms with the death of the deeased, but came short of stating the family’s position on sentencing.
4. I fully agree that the accused person ought to be aided to pursue his life prospects given that he was in a tertiary institution. For that to happen there must be a peaceful co-existence between the accused person and his family on one hand and the family of the deceased on the other hand given that both families are from the same clan. I am of the considered view that the family of the accused person ought to have taken further steps to engage that of the deceased in view of the fact that family of the deceased is yet to come to terms with the death of the deceased. Short of that, releasing the accused person on a non-custodial sentence may put his life in danger.
5. I would have admitted the accused person into a non-custodial sentence had the foregone been undertaken. Given the prevailing state of affairs I am of the position that it is unsafe to release the accused person at this point in time. Reconciliatory efforts ought to be undertaken or the acused person do serves a custodial sentence in return. Having taken all relevant considerations into account I hereby setence the accused person to 5 years’ imprisonment. The accused person has the option of applying for review of the sentence once reconcilation is undertaken.
It is so ordered.
DELIVERED, DATEDandSIGNEDat MIGORI this28thday ofJune 2019
A. C. MRIMA
JUDGE
Sentence delivered in open Court and in the presence of:
Mr. Mwita KerarioCounsel for the Accused person.
Mr. Kimanthi, Senior Principal Prosecution Counsel instructed by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for the State.
Evelyne Nyauke –Court Assistant