[2014] KEHC 5712 (KLR)
The trial magistrate erred in sentencing the respondent to 6 months imprisonment in default of payment of a Kshs 8,000 fine, as Section 28(2) of the Penal Code prescribes a maximum of 3 months imprisonment in default for such a fine. The High Court, exercising its revisionary jurisdiction, set aside the erroneous...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 5712 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Patrick Kilyungi Mutemi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Garissa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 3 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision
- Outcome
- sentence revised and substituted
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Error, Revisionary Jurisdiction, Default Sentence, Fine in Lieu of Imprisonment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Patrick Kilyungi Mutemi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial magistrate was contrary to Section 28 of the Penal Code.
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate erred in sentencing the accused to 6 months imprisonment in default of a fine of Kshs 8,000.
- 3 Whether procedural errors occurred in the lower court proceedings, including failure to indicate language used, compliance with Section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and omission to sentence on one count.
Ratio Decidendi
The trial magistrate erred in sentencing the respondent to 6 months imprisonment in default of payment of a Kshs 8,000 fine, as Section 28(2) of the Penal Code prescribes a maximum of 3 months imprisonment in default for such a fine. The High Court, exercising its revisionary jurisdiction, set aside the erroneous sentence and substituted it with a lawful sentence of a Kshs 5,000 fine in default to serve 3 months imprisonment for each count, with the sentences to run concurrently if the fine is not paid. The court also noted additional procedural errors in the lower court proceedings, including failure to indicate the language used by witnesses, lack of clarity on compliance with Section...
Court Disposition
sentence revised and substituted
Orders
- The sentence of payment of Kshs 8,000 fine in default to serve 6 months imprisonment is set aside.
- The respondent is sentenced to pay a fine of Kshs 5,000 in default to serve 3 months imprisonment in each count.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT GARISSA
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 3 OF 2014
REPUBLIC.................................................................APPLICANT
AND
PATRICK KILYUNGI MUTEMI.................................RESPONDENT
RULING ON REVISION
Mwingi Senior Resident Magistrate’s Criminal Case No. 508 of 2013 was brought to the attention of this court by the Ag. Senior Principal Magistrate. It is for revision to correct the sentence which is said to be against Section 28 of the Penal Code. The accused in the lower court, Patrick Kilyungi Mutemi (Patrick) faced two counts of creating disturbance in a manner likely to cause a breach of peace contrary to Section 95 (1) (b) of the Penal Code. It was alleged that on 17th September 2013 at Kiomo village Kiomo location of Mwingi Central District of Kitui County he chased Mbete Mwinzi while armed with a knife. It alleged in count two that on 18th September 2013 at Kiomo village in Kiomo Location in Mwingi Central District of Kitui County he chased and threatened Regina Muusi while armed with a knife.
The case went to full trial after which Patrick was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Kshs 8000 in default to serve 6 months.
An offence under Section 95 (1) (b) of the Penal Code attracts imprisonment for six months. Under Section 28 (2) of the Penal Code a fine exceeding Kshs 2,500 but not exceeding Kshs 15,000 attracts imprisonment for 3 months in default of payment of such fine. The trial magistrate was in error in giving 6 months in default of payment of Kshs 8,000.
My reading of the record of the lower court reveals more errors. The language used by the witnesses is not indicated; there is no indication as to whether Section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code was complied with and the trial magistrate omitted to sentence Patrick for one count. The trial magistrate also omitted to call for the previous records of the offender. The order reads: “Accused convicted on own plea of guilty ordered to pay Kshs 8000 in default serve 6 months. Sentences to run concurrently”(sic).The trial magistrate omitted to capture conviction of both counts during the sentencing although he stated that the sentences were to run concurrently. I have looked at the committal warrant and I have noted that it captures both counts. This is an error that requires to be corrected.
The power of this court on revision includes power to alter or reverse an order made by the lower court. It is for this reason that I hereby correct the error of the lower court as follows:
The sentence of payment of Kshs 8,000 fine in default to serve 6 months imprisonment is hereby set aside. In its place, this court sentences Patrick Kilyungi Mutemi to pay a fine of Kshs 5,000 in default to serve 3 months imprisonment in each count. If the fine is not paid and the sentences in default must be served, then they shall be served concurrently. I make orders accordingly.
Dated, signed and delivered on 19th March 2014.
S.N.MUTUKU
JUDGE