[2020] KEHC 956 (KLR)
The court found that there were no compelling reasons to deny the accused bail. The pre-bail report was favorable, indicating the accused was law-abiding and that both the accused's and deceased's families supported bail and were in reconciliation. The court emphasized that the right to bail is constitutionally...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 956 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Patrick Kipkemoi Bett
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bomet
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 11 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application
- Outcome
- bail granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Bail Application, Murder Charge, Pre Bail Report, Victim Impact Statement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Patrick Kipkemoi Bett
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there were no compelling reasons to deny the accused bail. The pre-bail report was favorable, indicating the accused was law-abiding and that both the accused's and deceased's families supported bail and were in reconciliation. The court emphasized that the right to bail is constitutionally guaranteed unless compelling reasons exist, and that the main purpose of bail is to secure the accused's attendance at trial. Exercising its discretion, the court granted bail with conditions, including a cash bail and surety.
Court Disposition
bail granted with conditions
Orders
- The accused shall post cash bail of Kshs.500,000 with one surety of similar amount.
- The accused shall attend court whenever required and shall not impede the trial in any way.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT BOMET
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 11 OF 2020
REPUBLIC.............................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
PATRICK KIPKEMOI BETT.......ACCUSED
RULING
1. The accused Patrick Kipkemoi Bett is charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence are that on 14th May 2020 at Kimawit location in Sotik Sub-county within Bomet County murdered Kevin Kipngeno.
2. The accused took plea before me on 3/11/2020 and denied the charge. His counsel Mr. Leteipa promptly made an application for the accused to be released on reasonable bond terms. On his part Mr. Mureithi learned Principal Prosecution Counsel asked the court to direct that a pre-bail report be filed. The court acceded to the request and directed that the report be filed within 14 days.
3. When the matter came up for hearing on 2/12/2020, Ms. Chepkemoi submitted that the pre-bail report was positive and that there were no compelling reasons to deny the accused bail. On his part Mr. Mureithi left the matter to the discretion of the court.
4. The pre-bail report casts the accused as a law abiding citizen who prior to the incident used alcohol moderately. The report describes the circumstances of the offence as arising out of a love triangle between the deceased, the accused and an unnamed woman. That the accused and the deceased fought and in the course of the fight the accused fatally stabbed the deceased.
5. With respect to the victim impact statement, the Probation Officer recorded that the deceased’s family had come to terms with the loss of their son and were in reconciliation negotiations with the accused’s family. That the two families were related through marriage and they wished to maintain their cordial relationship. That both families had no reservations about the accused being released on bail.
6. I have considered the application. I have also considered the pre-bail report and the victim impact statement. Both reports are favourable to the accused. I must however state that the court is not bound by the social inquiry report and must exercise discretion judiciously. It is the duty of the court to consider the application on the basis of Article 49 (i) h which grants the right to bail. In considering the application, the court also bears in mind that the primary purpose of bail is to ensure that the accused attends his trial.
7. I have come to the conclusion that there are no compelling reasons to deny the accused bail. He is released on the following conditions:-
i. He shall post cash bail of Kshs.500,000/= with one surety of similar amount.
ii. He shall attend court whenever required and shall not impede the trial in any way.
8. Orders accordingly.
Ruling delivered, dated and signed this 16th day of December, 2020.
...................................
R. LAGAT-KORIR
JUDGE
Ruling delivered in the presence of the Accused, Defence Counsel Mr. Leteipa, Mr. Mureithi for the DPP, and Kiprotich (Court Assistant).